Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Float VS Ninja Build

Compare Float VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

Float

The leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. With a simple, drag and drop interface and powerful editing tools, Float saves you time and keeps projects on track.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
$5 / Monthly ($5/person scheduled/month)
Alternatives Is it good?
Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Sugarbug
Connect your tools into a living knowledge graph. Sugarbug captures every signal to deliver compounding insights and unified context. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be a lot more popular than Float. While we know about 23 links to Ninja Build, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Float.

social mentions
2 vs 23
Resource Scheduling popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 53

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Float
Ninja Build
Website float.com ninja-build.org
Pricing
$5 / Monthly ($5/person scheduled/month) Official pricing
Open source
Platforms
Browser iOS Android
β€”
Company 2012 β€”
Listed in
Employee Scheduling Resource Scheduling Resource Management Project Planning Project Management Productivity +3
Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools Package Manager +1

About Float and Ninja Build

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Float
Ninja Build

Float is the world's leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. Since 2012, Float has been helping the world’s best teams including RGA, VICE, Deloitte, and Buzzfeed schedule and deliver over 5.5million tasks, in more than 150 countries. With an easy to use, intuitive...

Read more about Float

No description of Ninja Build yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Float 5 features
Ninja Build 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Float offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels.
  • Collaboration Tools
    Float provides robust collaboration features, including real-time updates and team communication capabilities, which enhance team coordination.
  • Resource Management
    The platform excels at resource management, allowing for efficient allocation and tracking of team members and project resources.
  • Integrations
    Float integrates with popular tools like Slack, Trello, and Asana, streamlining workflows and improving productivity.
  • Mobile Accessibility
    With mobile accessibility, users can manage schedules and resources on-the-go, adding flexibility to their project management.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Float may be considered expensive for small businesses or startups due to its subscription pricing model.
  • Limited Customization
    Users may find limitations in terms of customization options for specific needs or preferences.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there may still be a learning curve for users who are new to project management tools.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report occasional performance issues, such as slow loading times or lag, particularly with larger projects.
  • Reporting Features
    While adequate for basic needs, the reporting and analytics features may not be as advanced as some competitors.
  • Speed
    Ninja is designed for high performance, making it one of the fastest build systems available. It minimizes the time spent on tasks such as parsing, dependency resolution, and build command execution.
  • Simplicity
    Ninja’s configuration syntax is straightforward and concise, reducing the complexity involved in setting up builds and allowing for a clear overview of build rules.
  • Parallelism
    Ninja excels at handling parallel builds, leveraging multiple cores effectively to decrease overall build times.
  • Incremental Builds
    Ninja efficiently handles incremental builds by only recompiling what is necessary, which significantly speeds up iterative development processes.
  • Integration
    Ninja is often used as the backend for more complex build systems (e.g., CMake), making it a versatile tool within a larger toolchain.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    Ninja is deliberately minimalist, lacking many of the features found in other build systems, such as built-in support for complex dependency management and custom build steps.
  • Learning Curve
    While Ninja itself has a simple syntax, the learning curve can be steep for those unfamiliar with how build systems work or for those coming from more feature-rich environments.
  • Dependency on Generators
    Ninja often requires an external generator (like CMake) to create its build files, which can add to the setup complexity and introduce dependencies on other tools.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    Unlike some build systems that offer extensive scripting support (e.g., Python in SCons), Ninja's functionality is largely limited to what its syntax and predefined rules allow.
  • Less Flexibility
    Due to its minimalist nature, Ninja may not be as flexible as other build systems, potentially limiting its use in more complex or unusual build scenarios.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Float
Ninja Build

Overall verdict

  • Float is generally well-regarded and is a strong choice for teams looking for a reliable resource management solution. While it may not suit all businesses, particularly those seeking a broader project management suite, it excels in its niche.

Why this product is good

  • Float is considered good due to its user-friendly interface, robust features, and seamless integrations with various project management tools. It allows teams to efficiently plan, schedule, and track resources, ensuring optimal utilization and project efficiency.

Recommended for

  • Project managers who need to allocate resources quickly and effectively.
  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking for a straightforward resource management tool.
  • Teams that integrate with other popular project management software and need complementary resource scheduling.

Overall verdict

  • Ninja Build is considered a strong choice for users seeking a fast, reliable, and efficient build system. Its simplicity and focus on performance make it appealing to developers working on projects where build speed is critical.

Why this product is good

  • Ninja Build is a high-performance build system designed to handle complex build processes efficiently. It is known for its minimalistic yet powerful design, which allows for faster build times compared to traditional build systems like Make. Its approach to dependency tracking and parallelism is optimized for modern build environments, making it suitable for large codebases and incremental builds.

Recommended for

    Ninja Build is recommended for developers working on large-scale projects with complex build processes, particularly in environments where build speed and efficiency are prioritized. It is especially beneficial for projects that are continuously integrated or require frequent incremental builds.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Float 3 videos + Add
Ninja Build 1 video + Add

Sonic NEW Lemonberry Slush Float Review πŸ‹πŸ“

More videos

  • - Swimways Baby Float Review | Dude Dad
  • - Glorious G Float Review.. Should You Upgrade To Ceramic Mouse Feet?

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Float
Ninja Build
100% 100%
Resource Scheduling
0% 0%
0% 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100%
100% 100%
Employee Scheduling
0% 0%
0% 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Float and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Float no reviews yet
Ninja Build no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Ninja Build yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Float 2 mentions
Ninja Build 23 mentions
  • 2022 Accounting/time billing ideas for SW dev consulting? On my second, not really happy
    You wouldn't want something like NetSuite just for time entry. Try float.com, one of my clients uses this and it seems to be work and is simple. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Project/Team Management software/platform assistance needed
    Schedule more than one task to a team member per day i.e. Hours per task per day - float.com and avasa.com allows this. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • CMake Made Simple: A Reusable Template for Your First C++ Project
    On Windows, download the binaries from the cmake and Ninja websites. After that, add the executables to your PATH. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Float and Ninja Build

When comparing Float and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...