Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Float VS CMake

Compare Float VS CMake and see what are their differences

Float

The leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. With a simple, drag and drop interface and powerful editing tools, Float saves you time and keeps projects on track.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
$5 / Monthly ($5/person scheduled/month)
Alternatives Is it good?
CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
cobwebs.app
Tap a thing and the counter resets. A quiet, local-first day counter for the things you keep meaning to do. No account needed, no spreadsheet. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CMake seems to be a lot more popular than Float. While we know about 55 links to CMake, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Float.

social mentions
2 vs 55
Resource Scheduling popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 112

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Float
CMake
Website float.com cmake.org
Pricing
$5 / Monthly ($5/person scheduled/month) Official pricing
โ€”
Platforms
Browser iOS Android
โ€”
Company 2012 โ€”
Listed in
Employee Scheduling Resource Scheduling Resource Management Project Planning Project Management Productivity +3
Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools Package Manager +1

About Float and CMake

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Float
CMake

Float is the world's leading resource management software for agencies, studios, and firms. Since 2012, Float has been helping the worldโ€™s best teams including RGA, VICE, Deloitte, and Buzzfeed schedule and deliver over 5.5million tasks, in more than 150 countries. With an easy to use, intuitive...

Read more about Float

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Read more about CMake

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Float 5 features
CMake 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Float offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users of all skill levels.
  • Collaboration Tools
    Float provides robust collaboration features, including real-time updates and team communication capabilities, which enhance team coordination.
  • Resource Management
    The platform excels at resource management, allowing for efficient allocation and tracking of team members and project resources.
  • Integrations
    Float integrates with popular tools like Slack, Trello, and Asana, streamlining workflows and improving productivity.
  • Mobile Accessibility
    With mobile accessibility, users can manage schedules and resources on-the-go, adding flexibility to their project management.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Float may be considered expensive for small businesses or startups due to its subscription pricing model.
  • Limited Customization
    Users may find limitations in terms of customization options for specific needs or preferences.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there may still be a learning curve for users who are new to project management tools.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users report occasional performance issues, such as slow loading times or lag, particularly with larger projects.
  • Reporting Features
    While adequate for basic needs, the reporting and analytics features may not be as advanced as some competitors.
  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Float
CMake

Overall verdict

  • Float is generally well-regarded and is a strong choice for teams looking for a reliable resource management solution. While it may not suit all businesses, particularly those seeking a broader project management suite, it excels in its niche.

Why this product is good

  • Float is considered good due to its user-friendly interface, robust features, and seamless integrations with various project management tools. It allows teams to efficiently plan, schedule, and track resources, ensuring optimal utilization and project efficiency.

Recommended for

  • Project managers who need to allocate resources quickly and effectively.
  • Small to medium-sized businesses looking for a straightforward resource management tool.
  • Teams that integrate with other popular project management software and need complementary resource scheduling.

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Float 3 videos + Add
CMake 3 videos + Add

Sonic NEW Lemonberry Slush Float Review ๐Ÿ‹๐Ÿ“

More videos

  • - Swimways Baby Float Review | Dude Dad
  • - Glorious G Float Review.. Should You Upgrade To Ceramic Mouse Feet?

CMake for Dummies

More videos

  • - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert โ€œUsing Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Designโ€
  • - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0โ€“100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0โ€“20 21โ€“40 41โ€“50 51โ€“60 61โ€“100
Float
CMake
100% 100%
Resource Scheduling
0% 0%
0% 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100%
100% 100%
Employee Scheduling
0% 0%
0% 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Float and CMake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Float no reviews yet
CMake no reviews yet

We have no reviews of CMake yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Float 2 mentions
CMake 55 mentions
  • 2022 Accounting/time billing ideas for SW dev consulting? On my second, not really happy
    You wouldn't want something like NetSuite just for time entry. Try float.com, one of my clients uses this and it seems to be work and is simple. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Project/Team Management software/platform assistance needed
    Schedule more than one task to a team member per day i.e. Hours per task per day - float.com and avasa.com allows this. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Float and CMake

When comparing Float and CMake, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...