Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

fish shell VS ptpython

Compare fish shell VS ptpython and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

fish shell logo fish shell

The friendly interactive shell.

ptpython logo ptpython

a better Python REPL
  • fish shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-23
  • ptpython Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-02

fish shell features and specs

  • User-Friendly Syntax
    Fish shell features a more readable and user-friendly syntax compared to traditional shells like Bash or Zsh, making it easier for new users to learn and use.
  • Modern Features
    Fish shell includes out-of-the-box support for modern shell features such as syntax highlighting, autosuggestions, and smart command-line completions, greatly enhancing the user experience.
  • Web-Based Configuration
    Users can configure Fish shell through a web interface, making it more accessible and easier to customize compared to other shells that require manual configuration file edits.
  • Consistent Scripting
    Fish shell uses a consistent scripting language, which reduces the quirks and peculiarities often found in other shell scripting languages.

Possible disadvantages of fish shell

  • Compatibility Issues
    Fish shell is not POSIX compliant, which means scripts written in Fish will not be compatible with other POSIX-compliant shells like Bash or Zsh, potentially causing issues in environments that rely on such standards.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to shells like Bash and Zsh, Fish has a smaller ecosystem of plugins, themes, and community support, which could limit available resources and tools.
  • Learning Curve for Experienced Users
    Experienced users of traditional shells like Bash or Zsh might find Fish's different syntax and features take some time to adapt to, potentially reducing initial productivity.
  • Limited Script Portability
    Scripts written in Fish shell are often not portable to other shell environments without significant modification, reducing their usability in multi-shell setups.

ptpython features and specs

  • Syntax Highlighting
    Ptpython provides syntax highlighting which makes the code easier to read and write, helping users to identify elements such as keywords, strings, and variables quickly.
  • Autocompletion
    The tool offers powerful autocompletion, allowing for faster code writing by suggesting variable names, functions, and methods as you type.
  • Vi and Emacs Keybindings
    Support for both Vi and Emacs keybindings means users can navigate and edit code using their preferred text-editing shortcuts, enhancing productivity and comfort.
  • Embeddable
    Ptpython can be embedded in other applications, providing a flexible option to integrate an interactive shell within custom projects.
  • Customizable Configuration
    Users can customize various options in ptpython using a Python file, allowing for a highly personalized interactive environment.

Possible disadvantages of ptpython

  • Dependency on prompt-toolkit
    Ptpython requires the installation of the prompt-toolkit library, adding a dependency that needs to be managed within your environment.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    For those unfamiliar with interactive Python shells or text-editor keybindings, ptpython might present a steeper learning curve compared to simpler alternatives like the default Python REPL.
  • Resource Consumption
    The advanced features of ptpython, such as real-time syntax highlighting and auto-completion, may consume more system resources compared to the standard Python shell.
  • Limited Library Support
    While ptpython itself is well-supported, users might encounter compatibility issues or lack of support with other third-party libraries or extensions they wish to use.
  • Potential for Overhead
    For simple tasks or quick tests, the additional features of ptpython may introduce unnecessary overhead compared to using a basic Python shell.

fish shell videos

+ Add

this tank is not overstocked | Fish Tank Review Ep. 1

More videos:

  • Review - Can Female Bettas Live In A Bowl Together? | Fish Tank Review 36
  • Review - Ryan's First Time Catching Fish for Dinner!!!

ptpython videos

+ Add

A BETTER PYTHON REPL (READ EVAL PRINT LOOP) - PTPYTHON

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to fish shell and ptpython)

fish shell

ptpython

Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
Cryptocurrencies
0% 0
Python IDE
0 0%
Python IDE
100% 100
Blockchain
100 100%
Blockchain
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using fish shell and ptpython. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fish shell seems to be a lot more popular than ptpython. While we know about 134 links to fish shell, we've tracked only 11 mentions of ptpython. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

fish shell mentions (134)

  • A short tutorial on using fish shell.
    Follow this to install. Note that this tutorial assume that you are on Linux. - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago
  • Tools for 2025
    I've probably been using fish shell [0] for close to 10 years now. When I need POSIX compliance or if I need to run a one-off bash command, I just call bash. It's exceedingly rare. Browsing through the documentation for Oils, it seems to be organized in a way that's very confusing. When you open the fish shell website it was two clear buttons for Tutorial and Documentation. [0] https://fishshell.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • TIL: Ghostty — a new and quite promising terminal emulator
    I remember that Julia Evans, whose blog I follow, mentioned a few time that she uses Fish. Also, some days ago I came across this post about Fish rewrite to Rust from C++, which sounds like a cool thing to do. However, I tried it some time ago, and while pretty neat, I wasn't convinced to switch to it completely. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Easy development environments with Nix and Nix flakes!
    The default shell in the above flake adds Valkey, NodeJS 22, the PNPM package manager, and the fish shell to the environment. It also starts Valkey in the background through a shell hook, passing it a custom config (declared via Nix!) and runs fish so we're dropped in the fish shell instead of our login shell. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • A new shell for using modern Unix commands
    I’m testing a new shell called fish, and I’m enjoying some features that truly make it a friendly interactive shell. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

ptpython mentions (11)

  • Why Lisp?
    If you like using the REPL, for Python I recommend you try https://github.com/prompt-toolkit/ptpython. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Tools for productivity
    REPL??? Do you have a very-easy-to-use way of running and testing your code? From vim-slime to nvim sniprun to autocommands with the built in terminal, to an external repl like ptpython (for python obviously). iron.nvim and conjure are two other neovim repl plugins. There are many ways of running the code that you're working on, and having something that makes this really easy for you is pretty essential.... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is there a vim mode for zsh ?
    I use ptpython for my python repl https://github.com/prompt-toolkit/ptpython. I find it very convenient because it has a vim mode, and many vim similarities. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is there a way to make the Python IDLE auto-close brackets and quotations?
    A library like ptpython should be what you're looking for, however this probably isn't an option for an exam setting. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Where do I go after learning lua?
    Create a repl to the standard that ptpython sets for python (both croissant and ilua leave a lot to be desired). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing fish shell and ptpython, you can also consider the following products

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

iPython - iPython provides a rich toolkit to help you make the most out of using Python interactively.

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

bpython - bpython is a fancy interface to the Python interpreter for Unix-like operating systems (I hear it...

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.

Jupyter - Project Jupyter exists to develop open-source software, open-standards, and services for interactive computing across dozens of programming languages. Ready to get started? Try it in your browser Install the Notebook.

Loading...