Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

bpython VS fish shell

Compare bpython VS fish shell and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

bpython logo bpython

bpython is a fancy interface to the Python interpreter for Unix-like operating systems (I hear it...

fish shell logo fish shell

The friendly interactive shell.
  • bpython Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-03
  • fish shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-23

bpython features and specs

  • Autocomplete Feature
    bpython offers an intelligent autocomplete feature that predicts and suggests completions for code, which can speed up development by reducing the amount of typing needed.
  • Syntax Highlighting
    This interpreter provides syntax highlighting, making it easier for developers to read and understand code by color-coding different elements such as keywords, strings, and variables.
  • Integrated Documentation
    bpython allows users to easily access Python documentation directly from the interpreter, which helps to quickly reference function signatures and documentation without leaving the environment.
  • Replay Functionality
    Users can replay their session to see what commands were run, helping to keep track of changes made during coding sessions, making debugging and learning from past sessions much easier.
  • Friendly User Interface
    bpython provides an enhanced console interface that is more user-friendly compared to the standard Python interpreter, with features like in-line syntax highlighting and color-coded warnings and errors.

Possible disadvantages of bpython

  • Limited Support for Advanced Features
    It might not support some of the advanced features and libraries that other more complex environments (like Jupyter or full IDEs) might provide, potentially limiting its use for more advanced programming tasks.
  • Performance Overhead
    The additional features like syntax highlighting and autocomplete can introduce some performance overhead, which might not be desirable for users who prefer a fast, minimalistic environment.
  • Dependency Management
    Since bpython runs within a terminal environment, managing dependencies can sometimes be cumbersome, especially when working with projects that require specific environments or packages.
  • Learning Curve for New Users
    While offering many useful features, new Python users might initially find the interface overwhelming or confusing compared to the traditional Python interpreter.
  • Stability Issues
    Some users might experience occasional stability issues or unexpected behavior when using bpython, particularly when experimenting with more complex Python code or environments.

fish shell features and specs

  • User-Friendly Syntax
    Fish shell features a more readable and user-friendly syntax compared to traditional shells like Bash or Zsh, making it easier for new users to learn and use.
  • Modern Features
    Fish shell includes out-of-the-box support for modern shell features such as syntax highlighting, autosuggestions, and smart command-line completions, greatly enhancing the user experience.
  • Web-Based Configuration
    Users can configure Fish shell through a web interface, making it more accessible and easier to customize compared to other shells that require manual configuration file edits.
  • Consistent Scripting
    Fish shell uses a consistent scripting language, which reduces the quirks and peculiarities often found in other shell scripting languages.

Possible disadvantages of fish shell

  • Compatibility Issues
    Fish shell is not POSIX compliant, which means scripts written in Fish will not be compatible with other POSIX-compliant shells like Bash or Zsh, potentially causing issues in environments that rely on such standards.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to shells like Bash and Zsh, Fish has a smaller ecosystem of plugins, themes, and community support, which could limit available resources and tools.
  • Learning Curve for Experienced Users
    Experienced users of traditional shells like Bash or Zsh might find Fish's different syntax and features take some time to adapt to, potentially reducing initial productivity.
  • Limited Script Portability
    Scripts written in Fish shell are often not portable to other shell environments without significant modification, reducing their usability in multi-shell setups.

bpython videos

+ Add

Bpython - alternative interactive python interpreter

More videos:

fish shell videos

+ Add

this tank is not overstocked | Fish Tank Review Ep. 1

More videos:

  • Review - Can Female Bettas Live In A Bowl Together? | Fish Tank Review 36
  • Review - Ryan's First Time Catching Fish for Dinner!!!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to bpython and fish shell)

bpython

fish shell

Python IDE
100 100%
Python IDE
0% 0
Cryptocurrencies
0 0%
Cryptocurrencies
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Blockchain
0 0%
Blockchain
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using bpython and fish shell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fish shell seems to be a lot more popular than bpython. While we know about 134 links to fish shell, we've tracked only 7 mentions of bpython. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

bpython mentions (7)

  • What dev tools do you use in your python projects?
    Yeah, also it's worth to mention bpython. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Release of IPython 8.0
    Yeah, mostly I lack time to catch up with Jonathan Slenders works, and have stronger backward compatibility requirements. b=But ptpython and pyipython are both great. I should also look into Rich and Textual https://bpython-interpreter.org/ is also another alternative python shell, and of course https://xon.sh. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Need help setting up python on arch linux
    Python comes with IDLE as /usr/bin/idle but it doesn't have a corresponding .desktop file that would let it appear in the application menu. Otherwise, /usr/bin/python has an interactive mode and bpython is a wrapper around that interactive mode that has like syntax highlighting, indenting, undo, etc. Source: over 3 years ago
  • PyCharm console
    Someone posted bpython which I'm pretty ecstatic about but always good to know options. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • PyCharm console
    Someone else posted this - bpython - which is what I was looking for. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

fish shell mentions (134)

  • A short tutorial on using fish shell.
    Follow this to install. Note that this tutorial assume that you are on Linux. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • Tools for 2025
    I've probably been using fish shell [0] for close to 10 years now. When I need POSIX compliance or if I need to run a one-off bash command, I just call bash. It's exceedingly rare. Browsing through the documentation for Oils, it seems to be organized in a way that's very confusing. When you open the fish shell website it was two clear buttons for Tutorial and Documentation. [0] https://fishshell.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • TIL: Ghostty — a new and quite promising terminal emulator
    I remember that Julia Evans, whose blog I follow, mentioned a few time that she uses Fish. Also, some days ago I came across this post about Fish rewrite to Rust from C++, which sounds like a cool thing to do. However, I tried it some time ago, and while pretty neat, I wasn't convinced to switch to it completely. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Easy development environments with Nix and Nix flakes!
    The default shell in the above flake adds Valkey, NodeJS 22, the PNPM package manager, and the fish shell to the environment. It also starts Valkey in the background through a shell hook, passing it a custom config (declared via Nix!) and runs fish so we're dropped in the fish shell instead of our login shell. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • A new shell for using modern Unix commands
    I’m testing a new shell called fish, and I’m enjoying some features that truly make it a friendly interactive shell. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bpython and fish shell, you can also consider the following products

iPython - iPython provides a rich toolkit to help you make the most out of using Python interactively.

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

IDLE - Default IDE which come installed with the Python programming language.

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

ptpython - a better Python REPL

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.

Loading...