Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Fillout.com VS Continue.dev

Compare Fillout.com VS Continue.dev and see what are their differences

Limey
Limey: Connect smarter with QR codes, links, sites, and digital business cards in one place. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Fillout.com logo Fillout.com

Make powerful forms instantly with AI

Continue.dev logo Continue.dev

Continue is the leading open-source AI code assistant. You can connect any models and any context to build custom autocomplete and chat experiences inside VS Code and JetBrains.
  • Fillout.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29
Not present

Fillout.com features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Fillout.com offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that allows users to create forms quickly without a steep learning curve.
  • Customization Options
    The platform provides a variety of customization options that enable users to tailor forms to their specific needs, including themes, colors, and fonts.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Fillout.com supports integration with a range of third-party applications and services, making it easy to connect form data with existing workflows and tools.
  • Responsive Design
    Forms created on Fillout.com are responsive, ensuring they function well on both desktop and mobile devices.
  • Data Security
    The platform prioritizes data security, offering features like SSL encryption to protect user information collected through forms.

Possible disadvantages of Fillout.com

  • Subscription Costs
    While Fillout.com offers a free tier, advanced features require a paid subscription, which may not be suitable for all budgets.
  • Feature Limitations in Free Plan
    The free plan has limitations on the number of forms and responses, which could be restrictive for users with high-volume needs.
  • Complex Integrations
    Some users may find integrating Fillout.com with less common or custom applications challenging due to limited support or documentation.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    There may be occasional performance issues, such as slow loading times, particularly during peak usage hours.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic use is straightforward, mastering more advanced features and customizations might require additional time and effort.

Continue.dev features and specs

  • Seamless Integration
    Continue.dev offers seamless integration with popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), allowing users to enhance their existing workflows without substantial changes.
  • Code Generation
    It provides robust code generation features that can increase productivity by automating repetitive coding tasks, saving developers time and effort.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform's user-friendly interface and clear documentation make it easy for developers to get started quickly, even with limited prior experience.
  • Community Support
    Continue.dev has an active community and support system, which can help users troubleshoot issues and share best practices.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    The platform supports real-time collaboration features that can help teams work together more efficiently, facilitating better communication and project management.

Possible disadvantages of Continue.dev

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for new users, particularly for those unfamiliar with AI-assisted development tools.
  • Dependency on IDE
    The performance and utility of Continue.dev heavily depend on its integration with specific IDEs, which might not suit developers using other environments.
  • Subscription Costs
    Access to the full feature set may require a subscription, which might be a consideration for small teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with many AI-driven tools, there could be privacy concerns related to code and data sharing, which organizations need to manage carefully.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    The tool may offer limited functionality when offline, which could be a drawback for developers working in environments with unstable internet access.

Fillout.com videos

+ Add

How to make beautiful forms with Airtable and fillout.com (for free!)

Continue.dev videos

+ Add

CONTINUE.DEV HONEST REVIEW: WORTH IT AI CODE ASSISTANT?

More videos:

  • Review - Continue.dev vs. Cline: The Best Coding Assistant for VSCode?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fillout.com and Continue.dev)

Fillout.com

Continue.dev

Form Builder
100 100%
Form Builder
0% 0
AI
0 0%
AI
100% 100
Forms And Surveys
100 100%
Forms And Surveys
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fillout.com and Continue.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Fillout.com and Continue.dev

Fillout.com Reviews

editlink.io vs Fillout: Which Tool Should You Use for Airtable Edit Links?
Fillout, like most form tools, is oriented toward creating records. Point it at Airtable and a submission tends to produce a new row. editlink.io is built to update an existing record in place โ€” same row, pre-filled with what's already there, saved straight back. If your records already exist and just need updating, that distinction is the whole ballgame.
Source: www.editlink.io

Continue.dev Reviews

We have no reviews of Continue.dev yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Fillout.com should be more popular than Continue.dev. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fillout.com mentions (9)

  • Looking for a form builder (similar to typeform) but can link dropdown questions to an external document.
    We build Fillout for just this type of reason. If you store the list of countries in Airtable, SmartSuite, HubSpot, Monday, Notion etc. You can have the options automatically sync to your Fillout form (you can't with Google Sheets currently but you can with all those other platforms). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Nango โ€“ Open unified API for product integrations
    We use Nango for https://fillout.com and it's been a great addition to our tech stack. Has made it much faster to add new integrations without having to navigate OAuth docs each time. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Tabular data entry?
    Yep as Russel said CSV is your best bet if you can import it. If it is over time something like fillout.com might be good to look at as it dirrectly creates the records. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Jotform or Typeform with new personal tokens
    Checkout fillout.com they are on top of it over there. And you and read, write, and update existing records. I haven't seen another form do that. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Iโ€™ve built a form builder where forms build themselves. What do you think?
    It seems similar to the feature fillout.com just rolled out. https://www.fillout.com/ai-form-builder. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Continue.dev mentions (3)

  • Feeding BrassCoders Output to Any AI Coding Assistant
    Check Continue's documentation for the current @file syntax in your version, as context-provider behavior has evolved across releases. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago
  • Using GitHub MCP With Continue to Review PRs and Issues 5 Faster
    # This is an example configuration file # To learn more, see the full config.yaml reference: https://docs.continue.dev/reference Name: Example Config Version: 1.0.0 Schema: v1 # Define which models can be used # https://docs.continue.dev/customization/models Models: - name: my gpt-5 provider: openai model: gpt-5 apiKey: YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY_HERE - uses: ollama/qwen2.5-coder-7b - uses:... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • When AI Assistants Meet Your VS Code Setup
    The Setup Reality: Installing Continue was straightforward since it functions as VS Code extension. Thereโ€™s a bit of a jump to configure. I was using Agent mode, and some of the settings have to be changed on the web UI. Right now, Iโ€™m using two different assistants: one for my Jekyll project and the other for my Astro projects. You can customize your assistant with what they call blocks by setting things like... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fillout.com and Continue.dev, you can also consider the following products

Tally.so - The simplest way to create forms, for free.

Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.

Typeform - Create beautiful, next-generation online forms with Typeform, the form & survey builder that makes asking questions easy & human on any device. Try it FREE!

Windsurf Editor - Tomorrow's editor, today. Windsurf Editor is the first AI agent-powered IDE that keeps developers in the flow. Available today on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Jotform - Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator

Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebaseโ€”no more context switching, just breakthrough results.

Loading...