Software Alternatives & Startups

filebrowser.org VS ownCloud

Compare filebrowser.org VS ownCloud and see what are their differences

filebrowser.org

A create-your-own-cloud-kind of software where you can install it on a server, direct it to a path and then access your files through a nice web interface. You have many available features!.

Rating
0 reviews
ownCloud

ownCloud is an open source project enabling businesses to host their own cloud storage while maintaining regulatory and compliance needs.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ownCloud should be more popular than filebrowser.org. It has been mentioned 33 times since March 2021.

social mentions
4 vs 33
Cloud Storage popularity
5% vs 95%
alternatives listed
37 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

f
filebrowser.org
ownCloud
Website filebrowser.org owncloud.com
Pricing
Open source Official pricing
Company Startup from Germany
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

f
filebrowser.org 5 features
ownCloud 5 features
  • Open Source
    FileBrowser is open source, which means the source code is available to the public, allowing for transparency, customization, and community-driven improvements.
  • Cross-Platform
    The software is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and various NAS devices, providing versatility in different environments.
  • Web-Based Interface
    FileBrowser offers a user-friendly web-based interface that can be accessed from any device with an internet connection, allowing easy file management remotely.
  • User Management
    It features a robust user management system, allowing administrators to create, modify, and delete user accounts with different access levels ensuring security and control.
  • Customizable
    Users can customize the interface and functionality to a certain extent, tailoring the experience to meet specific needs and preferences.

Possible disadvantages

  • Self-Hosting Required
    Users need to set up and maintain their server environment to host FileBrowser, which requires technical knowledge and can be resource-intensive.
  • Limited Built-In Features
    While FileBrowser handles basic file management well, it might lack some advanced features present in more comprehensive file management systems.
  • Security Responsibility
    Users are responsible for securing their installations, which includes managing updates, proper configuration, and ensuring data safety against breaches.
  • Performance Dependent on Host
    The performance of FileBrowser heavily depends on the server environment it's hosted on, which might lead to variability in experience across different setups.
  • Limited Support
    While there is community support available due to its open-source nature, official dedicated support might be limited compared to commercial alternatives.
  • Open Source
    ownCloud offers an open-source version, allowing users to inspect, modify, and enhance the software according to their needs.
  • Data Privacy
    Users maintain complete control over their data as it can be hosted on their own servers, ensuring compliance with data privacy regulations.
  • Customizability
    The platform provides extensive customization options, enabling users to tailor it to their specific requirements.
  • Integration Capabilities
    ownCloud supports various integrations with third-party services and applications, enhancing its functionality.
  • Active Community
    A vibrant and active community contributes to continuous improvements, bug fixes, and the development of new features.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and may require technical expertise, which can be a barrier for non-tech-savvy users.
  • Maintenance Requirements
    Self-hosting ownCloud necessitates regular maintenance, updates, and security management, which can be time-consuming.
  • Performance Issues
    Performance can be impacted by the server's hardware capabilities and the efficiency of the network infrastructure.
  • Costs
    While the open-source version is free, the enterprise version, which offers more features and support, comes with a cost.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    In comparison to some proprietary cloud storage solutions, ownCloud may lack certain advanced features and ease of use.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

f
filebrowser.org
ownCloud

Overall verdict

  • File Browser is a solid, lightweight open-source web-based file management application that provides a clean interface for managing files on a server, making it a good choice for self-hosting enthusiasts who want a simple, free solution.

Why this product is good

  • It's completely free and open-source, giving you full control over your data without licensing costs
  • Lightweight and easy to install as a single binary or Docker container, requiring minimal system resources
  • Provides a clean, intuitive web interface for uploading, downloading, editing, and organizing files
  • Supports user management with configurable permissions and access controls
  • Includes handy features like file sharing links, a built-in text editor, and command execution
  • Cross-platform compatibility, running on Linux, Windows, and macOS

Recommended for

  • Self-hosting enthusiasts who want to manage files on their own server
  • Home lab users looking for a simple file management interface
  • Small teams needing a lightweight shared file access solution
  • Developers and system administrators comfortable with basic server setup
  • Users seeking a free alternative to commercial cloud storage interfaces
  • Anyone wanting to add a web-based file manager to a NAS or VPS

No analysis of ownCloud yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

f
filebrowser.org 0 videos + Add
ownCloud 2 videos + Add

No filebrowser.org videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

ownCloud Demonstration

More videos

  • - Create Your Own Hosted Cloud Storage Server in Minutes - OwnCloud

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
f
filebrowser.org
ownCloud
5% 5%
95% 95%
6% 6%
94% 94%
100% 100%
0% 0%
3% 3%
97% 97%

User comments

Share your experience with using filebrowser.org and ownCloud. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

f
filebrowser.org no reviews yet
ownCloud no reviews yet

We have no reviews of filebrowser.org yet. Be the first one to post

  • Best Top 12 MEGA Alternatives in 2024
    www.multcloud.com · Nov 2023

    ownCloud is an open-source file sync and share software for everyone from individuals operating the free ownCloud server, to large enterprises and service providers operating under the ownCloud Enterprise...

  • 6 cPanel Alternatives

    ownCloud is a file sharing solution for teams looking to manage data outside of something like Google Drive. The personal cloud storage solution has dozens of stable plugins that further consolidate data for...

  • 13 Best Free Dropbox Alternatives for File Sharing
    brainyhubs.com · Aug 2020

    Owncloud is not as such a cloud service, but a software to create our own. Owncloud allows us to take advantage of an old equipment or a service that we have to use it as if it were Dropbox.

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

f
filebrowser.org 4 mentions
ownCloud 33 mentions
  • File Sharing
    FileBrowser is not a file sharing tool in the traditional sense — it is a web file manager that happens to include link sharing. Point it at a directory on your server, and you get a browser-based UI to upload, download, rename, move,... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • 🏗️ Building my home server P4: Part 4: Docker, UFW and Nginx
    In my previous blog post, I discussed volume management. For the next step, I aimed to deploy a few apps and app stacks, such as File Browser and Transmission. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • 🏗️ Building my home server P2: Part 2: SMB with Samba
    I also access the files shared via SMB using a containerized FileBrowser. The directories need to be readable and writable by the user running inside that container. Since I prefered not to use the smbuser account there, I configured the... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

View more

  • Nextcloud vs ownCloud: Which File Server to Use?
    Nextcloud and ownCloud share a common ancestor. In 2016, Nextcloud's founder (Frank Karlitschek, who also founded ownCloud) forked ownCloud to create Nextcloud, taking most of the developer community with him. Since then, the projects... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • HomeLab
    Meanwhile, I came across some problems and errors. I heard that using ownCloud, a simpler alternative, might be better — so I’ll try that in the near future before moving all my files over. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Automating My Cloud Workflow with OwnCloud, Docker, and GCP
    Hey folks! 👋 I'm Sahal, a software engineer currently diving deeper into the world of DevOps and cloud automation. Recently, I’ve been working on deploying my own cloud storage solution using OwnCloud — self-hosted, scalable, and... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to filebrowser.org and ownCloud

When comparing filebrowser.org and ownCloud, you can also consider the following products.