Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Feedback Fish VS git-sizer

Compare Feedback Fish VS git-sizer and see what are their differences

Feedback Fish

Collect feedback & make your customers happy.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
git-sizer

Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
meetergo
GDPR-compliant meeting scheduling hosted in Germany. Booking pages, built-in video calls, lead routing, CRM and payments in one tool, with all data stored in Frankfurt and a data processing agreement (DPA/AVV) included. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Feedback Fish should be more popular than git-sizer. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 1
Customer Feedback popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Feedback Fish
git-sizer
Website feedback.fish github.com
Company Startup from the Netherlands —
Listed in
Customer Feedback User Feedback Feedback Product Management +1
Git Code Collaboration Git Tools

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Feedback Fish 5 features
git-sizer 5 features
  • Ease of Use
    Feedback Fish offers a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to quickly set up feedback forms without extensive technical knowledge.
  • Quick Integration
    The platform provides effortless integration with various websites and platforms, requiring minimal coding and setup time.
  • Real-Time Notifications
    Users receive real-time notifications when new feedback is submitted, allowing for prompt responses and actions.
  • Customization Options
    Feedback Fish allows for customization of the feedback widget to match the look and feel of the website, ensuring a seamless user experience.
  • Data Export
    The platform provides options for exporting feedback data, making it easy to analyze and integrate with other tools.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing
    For small businesses or individual users, the pricing might be on the higher side compared to alternative feedback collection solutions.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Feedback Fish may lack some advanced features that larger enterprises might require, such as detailed analytics or advanced reporting.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    Since it's a web-based tool, users need a stable internet connection to set up and receive feedback, which might be a limitation in low-connectivity environments.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    Although generally easy to use, there may be a learning curve for customizing the feedback widget to fit specific design requirements completely.
  • Limited Language Support
    Feedback Fish might not support multiple languages or localization, which could be a drawback for global businesses aiming for wider reach.
  • Comprehensive Repository Analysis
    git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
  • Easy to Use
    The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
  • Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
    It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
  • Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
    Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
  • Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
    It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Automatic Remediation
    git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
  • Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
    While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
  • Limited to Local Analysis
    The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
  • No Real-Time Monitoring
    It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
  • Command-Line Only Interface
    The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Feedback Fish
git-sizer

Overall verdict

  • Feedback Fish is generally considered a good choice for those who need a straightforward and effective solution to receive and manage user feedback. Its features cater well to small to medium-sized businesses and developers who prioritize ease of use and integration capabilities.

Why this product is good

  • Feedback Fish is known for its simplicity and user-friendly interface, which makes it easy for businesses and developers to collect feedback from users. It integrates well with various platforms and offers customizable feedback widgets, enabling users to gather insights directly from their website visitors. Its focus on privacy and data protection is another highlight, offering confidence to those concerned about data security.

Recommended for

    Feedback Fish is particularly recommended for startups, small business owners, web developers, and digital product teams who need a lightweight feedback tool that provides essential features without overwhelming complexity.

Overall verdict

  • git-sizer is a solid, focused open-source tool that effectively analyzes Git repositories to identify size and structural issues that could cause performance problems or hosting limits, making it a valuable diagnostic utility for repository maintenance.

Why this product is good

  • Quickly identifies large blobs, deep histories, and other repository bloat issues that impact performance
  • Simple command-line tool with no complex setup or dependencies required
  • Provides clear, actionable metrics about repository size and structure
  • Backed by GitHub, ensuring credibility and ongoing relevance to Git ecosystem needs
  • Helps proactively catch issues before they cause problems with hosting platforms or clone/fetch performance
  • Open source and actively maintained with community input

Recommended for

  • Repository administrators managing large or growing codebases
  • Teams migrating repositories to new hosting platforms with size limits
  • Developers troubleshooting slow clone, fetch, or checkout operations
  • DevOps engineers auditing repository health before major infrastructure changes
  • Organizations enforcing repository size policies or best practices
  • Anyone dealing with repositories that have accumulated large binary files or excessive history over time

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Feedback Fish
git-sizer
100% 100%
Customer Feedback
0% 0%
0% 0%
Git
100% 100%
100% 100%
User Feedback
0% 0%
0% 0%
Git Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Feedback Fish and git-sizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Feedback Fish 6 mentions
git-sizer 1 mention
  • Ask HN: What was an interesting project you started and finished over a weekend?
    With three friends, we built and launched a SaaS product over a weekend and live-streamed ourselves doing it[0]: https://feedback.fish It was a ton of fun, about 1,000 people tuned in over the course of those ~60 hours. The product was... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • I'm building a widget to help you collect feedback from your users and I'm looking for beta testers?
    You are literally copying https://feedback.fish/. Source: about 4 years ago
  • How do you SaaS owners log bugs?
    You can use an embeddable widget like feedback fish or question to have your users report bugs & ideas. Feedback fish lets them take a screenshot, question lets them record a video. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

  • how to keep github repos small?
    Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to Feedback Fish and git-sizer

When comparing Feedback Fish and git-sizer, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...