Software Alternatives & Startups

FAX.PLUS VS Opalstack

Compare FAX.PLUS VS Opalstack and see what are their differences

FAX.PLUS

Send and receive fax from anywhere, anytime, on any device (iOS, Android, and Web).

FAX.PLUS Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Opalstack

Managed Hosting for developers, entrepreneurs, and businesses like yours

Opalstack Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, FAX.PLUS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 10 times since March 2021.

social mentions
10 vs 0
Fax popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

FAX.PLUS
Opalstack
Website fax.plus opalstack.com
Pricing
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

FAX.PLUS 5 features
Opalstack 5 features
  • Ease of Use
    FAX.PLUS offers a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for individuals and businesses to send and receive faxes online without the need for a physical fax machine.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The service is accessible on multiple platforms including web browsers, iOS, Android, and even integrates with G Suite, providing flexibility for users across different devices.
  • Security and Compliance
    FAX.PLUS ensures secure transmission of faxes with end-to-end encryption and is compliant with regulations like HIPAA, making it suitable for industries that require secure communications.
  • Cloud Storage Integration
    It supports integration with cloud storage services like Google Drive, Dropbox, and Box, allowing users to send documents directly from their cloud storage accounts.
  • Flexible Pricing Plans
    FAX.PLUS offers a range of pricing plans, including a free tier, which can accommodate different user needs and budget constraints.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost for Higher Volume
    While there is a free plan available, businesses that have a high volume of faxes may find the cost of premium plans relatively high compared to other providers.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free plan offers limited features and a restricted number of faxes, which might not be sufficient for more frequent users.
  • Fax Delay
    Some users have reported occasional delays in sending or receiving faxes, which could be problematic for time-sensitive communications.
  • Internet Dependency
    As an online service, FAX.PLUS requires a stable internet connection to operate, which may be a limitation in areas with poor internet connectivity.
  • Developer-Friendly Hosting
    Opalstack is designed with developers in mind, offering SSH access, Git integration, and support for multiple programming languages and frameworks including Python, Node.js, Ruby, and PHP, giving developers granular control over their hosting environment.
  • Affordable Pricing
    Opalstack offers competitive pricing for shared and managed hosting plans, making it an accessible option for small businesses, freelancers, and individual developers who need robust features without enterprise-level costs.
  • Modern Control Panel
    Opalstack provides a clean, modern, and intuitive web-based dashboard for managing sites, applications, databases, and email accounts, which is a significant improvement over older-style hosting control panels like cPanel.
  • Strong Support for Multiple Applications
    The platform supports a wide variety of application types including WordPress, Django, Flask, Express, static sites, and more, allowing users to host diverse projects on a single account with easy deployment.
  • Reliable Infrastructure and Support
    Opalstack is built by former WebFaction team members, bringing experienced hosting expertise. They offer responsive customer support and a reputation for stable, well-managed server infrastructure with good uptime.

Possible disadvantages

  • Smaller Community and Ecosystem
    Compared to major hosting providers like DigitalOcean, AWS, or even shared hosts like SiteGround, Opalstack has a smaller user base, which means fewer community tutorials, third-party guides, and forum discussions available for troubleshooting.
  • Limited Scalability Options
    Opalstack is primarily a shared hosting provider, which means it may not be the best choice for high-traffic applications or projects that require rapid, on-demand scaling of resources like CPU, RAM, or storage.
  • Not Ideal for Beginners
    While developer-friendly, Opalstack's approach can be intimidating for non-technical users. Setting up applications often requires familiarity with the command line and server configuration, which may not suit those looking for simple one-click solutions.
  • Limited Data Center Locations
    Opalstack offers a relatively small number of data center locations compared to major cloud providers, which may result in higher latency for users targeting audiences in regions not well-served by the available server locations.
  • Fewer Managed Services and Add-ons
    Unlike larger hosting platforms, Opalstack lacks a wide range of managed add-on services such as built-in CDN integration, managed backups with granular restore options, or one-click SSL management that more mainstream providers offer out of the box.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

FAX.PLUS
Opalstack

No analysis of FAX.PLUS yet.

Overall verdict

  • Opalstack is a solid choice for developers and tech-savvy users seeking an affordable, flexible control panel hosting solution with good performance and transparent pricing, though it may require more technical know-how than mainstream cPanel hosts.

Why this product is good

  • Uses a custom lightweight control panel that's fast and efficient compared to resource-heavy alternatives like cPanel
  • Offers straightforward, transparent pricing without hidden fees or aggressive upselling
  • Provides SSD storage and solid server performance for the price point
  • Supports multiple app types including Python, Node.js, and various frameworks beyond typical PHP hosting
  • Founded by the original creators of WebFaction, bringing significant hosting industry experience
  • Good for running multiple websites/apps under one account with granular resource control
  • Responsive customer support with a knowledgeable team
  • No long-term contracts required, allowing flexibility

Recommended for

  • Developers who need support for Python, Node.js, or other non-PHP applications
  • Users comfortable with a more technical, non-cPanel control panel interface
  • Small businesses or freelancers hosting multiple websites who want granular control
  • Former WebFaction users looking for a similar service after its shutdown
  • Budget-conscious users who want VPS-like flexibility without full server management
  • Users who prioritize transparent pricing over bundled marketing extras

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

FAX.PLUS 2 videos + Add
Opalstack 0 videos + Add

FAX.PLUS Review: Great work in progress

More videos

No Opalstack videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
FAX.PLUS
Opalstack
100% 100%
Fax
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using FAX.PLUS and Opalstack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

FAX.PLUS 10 mentions
Opalstack 0 mentions
  • Which fax to email services are you using?
    We use fax.plus. We had an on prem FoIP and it failed and I had to do something quickly until we replace the 4 different phone systems across locations into one. Users seem to like it, user interface is super simple. My boss hates the... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Sending a fax
    Check out fax.plus - you can sign up for a free efax account and send your fax as a pdf. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Looking for a HIPAA compliant eFax service and a good MFP that integrate well with each other.
    Fax.plus works for us and is HIPAA compliant. You need to sign a business agreement to with them to get it written in stone, but that isn't an additional cost, and should be done anyway. Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Opalstack since Sep 2023.

Alternatives to FAX.PLUS and Opalstack

When comparing FAX.PLUS and Opalstack, you can also consider the following products.