Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fancybox VS jQuery UI

Compare Fancybox VS jQuery UI and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Fancybox logo Fancybox

fancyapps.com - Fancy App Store

jQuery UI logo jQuery UI

Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library
  • Fancybox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26
  • jQuery UI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17

Fancybox features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Fancybox offers a clean and intuitive interface that is easy for developers to integrate and for users to navigate, making it a popular choice for displaying images, videos, and other media content.
  • Responsive Design
    It is designed to be responsive, working seamlessly on various devices and screen sizes, which is essential for modern web applications.
  • Customizability
    Fancybox provides a range of customization options that allow developers to tailor its appearance and functionality to fit the specific needs of their projects.
  • Wide Range of Media Support
    The library supports a variety of media types such as images, videos, iframes, and HTML content, offering flexibility for different use cases.
  • Active Community and Support
    There is an active community and available documentation that provide support and resources for troubleshooting and enhancing the use of Fancybox.

Possible disadvantages of Fancybox

  • Potential Performance Issues
    Including Fancybox in a project might lead to increased load times, as it requires additional JavaScript and CSS files, which could affect site performance.
  • Limited Free Features
    The free version of Fancybox has limited features, which may not be sufficient for all users, pushing them towards the paid version for advanced functionalities.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    While Fancybox is customizable, achieving complex customizations may require a deeper understanding of both the library and JavaScript, posing a challenge for beginners.
  • Browser Compatibility Issues
    Occasionally, developers might encounter compatibility issues with certain browsers, necessitating additional testing and debugging.

jQuery UI features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    jQuery UI simplifies creating and managing complex UI components with straightforward syntax and comprehensive documentation.
  • Compatibility
    jQuery UI is highly compatible with older browsers, offering a broader range of support compared to more modern frameworks.
  • Extensibility
    jQuery UI is designed to be modular and extendable, allowing developers to use only the components they need and easily extend or theming them.
  • Rich Set of Widgets
    It comes with a variety of pre-built widgets such as datepickers, accordions, and sliders, which can save development time.
  • Animated Effects
    jQuery UI includes many built-in animation effects that can enhance the user experience without requiring additional libraries.
  • Theming
    The library provides Themeroller, a tool that allows developers to create custom themes easily, ensuring UI consistency and branding.

Possible disadvantages of jQuery UI

  • Performance
    Due to its extensive feature set, jQuery UI can be relatively heavy, which may affect performance, particularly in resource-constrained environments.
  • Not Mobile-First
    jQuery UI is not designed with mobile-first principles in mind, making it less optimal for modern responsive web applications.
  • Learning Curve
    While easy to use for simple tasks, mastering jQuery UI for more complex applications may require a significant learning curve.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Since jQuery UI relies on the jQuery library, it adds an additional dependency which can be limiting if you prefer or are required to use vanilla JS or another library.
  • Declining Popularity
    With the rise of modern frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, jQuery UI has seen a decline in popularity and community support.
  • Limited Modern Features
    Compared to contemporary UI libraries, jQuery UI lacks some of the modern features and performance optimizations found in newer libraries.

Fancybox videos

No Fancybox videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

jQuery UI videos

jQuery UI tutorial: Adding a user interface with jQuery UI | lynda.com

More videos:

  • Review - jQuery UI Ultimate:Design Amazing Interfaces Using jQuery UI : Understanding the curriculum.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fancybox and jQuery UI)
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fancybox and jQuery UI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jQuery UI should be more popular than Fancybox. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fancybox mentions (2)

jQuery UI mentions (15)

  • Let Me Talk About Component-based Front-end Development
    The once popular jQuery, with its strengths fully utilized in jQuery UI and Bootstrap, provides many UI components and is also friendly to backend developers, seemingly meeting the requirements. However, looking at their component implementation and resource loading forms—. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    jQuery UI: An open-source library for building user interfaces based on jQuery. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • What is a component library and should you build your own?
    Fortunately, when I started web development in earnest, many of these issues were ironed out. By this point, there were still a handful of libraries that made writing complex interfaces with cross-browser support a little easier. Jquery UI, the first component library I used, supported accordions and other widgets. But the browser is constantly evolving, and we now have a native way of implementing this accordion... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Best ReactJS library for Drag-n-Drop Table for plugin Admin view?
    Because WordPress is already have these jQuery & jQuery UI libraries (https://jqueryui.com/). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • jQuery 3.6.2 Released
    We still use jQuery + jQuery UI on our website because it is basically battle tested through 15+ years. https://jqueryui.com/ It is easy as hell. What's there to not like? I don't care to be called names or being old fashioned. I also don't care about "right" tooling for frontend. As far it works and it is robust and it is going to be around for many years, I am fine with it. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fancybox and jQuery UI, you can also consider the following products

PhotoSwipe - JavaScript gallery, no dependencies.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Magnific Popup - The greater part of Lightbox modules will completely preload a picture before showing it.

Composer - Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.