Software Alternatives & Startups

F# VS CreateFiles+

Compare F# VS CreateFiles+ and see what are their differences

F#

F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
CreateFiles+

Create blank files, custom file types, templates, whole batches, and reusable folder setups exactly where you are working on macOS.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $4.99 / One-off (2 mac licenses with purchase)
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, F# seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 22 times since March 2021.

social mentions
22 vs 0
Programming Language popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

F#
CreateFiles+
Website fsharp.org createfilesplus.com
Pricing
Open source
Paid Free trial $4.99 / One-off (2 mac licenses with purchase) Official pricing
Platforms —
MacOS Mac OSX Mac
Company — Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in

About F# and CreateFiles+

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

F#
CreateFiles+

We recommend LibHunt F# for discovery and comparisons of trending F# projects.

Read more about F#

CreateFiles+ adds the file creation workflow macOS should have had all along. Create a new file exactly where you are working, without opening TextEdit, saving-as, using Terminal, or dragging template files around. Use Finder right-click menus where macOS allows them, or fall back to the Finder...

Read more about CreateFiles+

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

F# 7 features
CreateFiles+ 4 features
  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    F# primarily supports functional programming, which promotes immutability and first-class functions, leading to more predictable and maintainable code.
  • Interoperability
    F# provides seamless interoperability with .NET libraries and languages like C#, allowing developers to leverage a vast ecosystem of tools and libraries.
  • Conciseness
    F# code tends to be concise and expressive, reducing boilerplate code and enhancing readability.
  • Type Inference
    Powerful type inference capabilities reduce the need for explicit type annotations, making the code easier to write and refactor.
  • Asynchronous Programming
    F# provides robust support for asynchronous programming, enabling the creation of responsive applications and efficient I/O handling.
  • Community and Resources
    An active community and wealth of online resources provide support and facilitate learning through forums, tutorials, and documentation.
  • Multi-Paradigm
    Despite its functional core, F# also supports imperative and object-oriented programming, offering flexibility to developers.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from imperative or object-oriented backgrounds, the functional programming paradigm in F# can present a steep learning curve.
  • IDE and Tooling
    Although F# is integrated into Visual Studio, the overall tooling and IDE support for F# is not as mature as for more established languages like C#.
  • Market Demand
    The demand for F# skillsets in the job market is comparatively lower than for more mainstream languages, potentially affecting career opportunities.
  • Performance Overhead
    While generally efficient, certain operations in F# may incur performance overhead due to the functional aspects and abstractions, especially when not optimized.
  • Library Support
    Although F# can access the .NET library ecosystem, it has a relatively smaller number of libraries and frameworks specifically designed for it compared to languages like Python or JavaScript.
  • Niche Language
    F# is often considered a niche language, which can lead to a smaller community and fewer resources compared to more popular languages.
  • Right-click on Finder
    Today finder does not let you create new files just folders. Our tool allows that in the Menu bar, Finder Menu, and in the body of any folder in macOS.
  • Quick file creation
    using the Flywheel to create new file types
  • Creating batch files
    Allows to create new files in batches up to 100 at a time
  • Folder packs
    Come with the app for different use cases and professions allowing the user to create commonly file types.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

F#
CreateFiles+

Overall verdict

  • F# is particularly well-regarded in areas such as financial computing, data analysis, scientific computing, and machine learning. Its ability to combine functional programming paradigms with .NET's powerful libraries and tools provides a versatile environment for both small and large projects. However, it might not be the best fit for developers who are not familiar with functional programming or are working in domains where F# lacks extensive libraries compared to other languages like Python or JavaScript.

Why this product is good

  • F# is a functional-first programming language that runs on the .NET platform. It emphasizes immutability and concise code, making it suitable for complex data processing, reactive programming, and quick prototyping. F# has strong support for parallel and asynchronous programming, which helps in efficiently utilizing multi-core processors.

Recommended for

  • Data Scientists
  • Financial Analysts
  • Developers seeking high-performance applications
  • Functional programming enthusiasts
  • Teams using the .NET ecosystem looking for a concise and expressive language.

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified information about CreateFiles+ (createfilesplus.com), as I don't have reliable data on this specific product or service to assess its quality, features, or reputation.

Why this product is good

  • Unable to confirm the legitimacy, functionality, or user reviews of this specific website or tool
  • No verified data available on pricing, features, or customer satisfaction
  • Recommend researching independently through reviews, user forums, and checking domain history before use
  • Consider checking for security certificates, privacy policy, and company transparency

Recommended for

  • Users should conduct their own due diligence before using this service
  • Verify through independent review sites, trust indicators like BBB or Trustpilot if available
  • Check domain age and reputation using tools like WHOIS lookup

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

F# 3 videos + Add
CreateFiles+ 1 video + Add

F# Software Foundation Year in Review

More videos

  • - F# Blues Harp Review
  • - F# base Bhavika flute review by Dhyey patel ji

CreateFiles+ Demo

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
F#
CreateFiles+
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
OOP
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing F# and CreateFiles+.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

Xcode and Swift

What makes your product unique?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

macOS should have created this feature out of the box but does not exist. Windows users have had this feature for over a decade. I created this to remove that gap for macOS users.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

I am not familiar with any competitors doing this today.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

Power Users, Developers, Productivity focused users, students, teachers, creators.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

Its brand new so that is yet to be determined.

What's the story behind your product?

CreateFiles+'s answer:

I have struggled with not having this capability in Finder for years and decided I would fix the problem for me and then see if other users would want the same solution.

User comments

Share your experience with using F# and CreateFiles+. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

F# 22 mentions
CreateFiles+ 0 mentions
  • Solving the NY Times "Pips" game with F#
    We'll use F# to implement this algorithm because functional programming is a good choice for "black box" problems like this that have no side-effects, and .NET is an easy, fast platform to work with. (F# is actually a great all-purpose... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • What's New in F# 9
    It's an open-source project with its own F# Software Foundation. If Microsoft drops it, I think it would continue. https://fsharp.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Rust panics under the hood, and implementing them in .NET
    Before Rich made Clojure for the JVM, he wrote dotLisp[1] for the CLR. Not long after Clojure was JVM hosted, it was also CLR hosted[2]. One of my first experiences with ML was F#[3], a ML variant that targets the CLR. These all... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

View more

Tracking CreateFiles+ since Jun 2026.

Alternatives to F# and CreateFiles+

When comparing F# and CreateFiles+, you can also consider the following products.