Software Alternatives & Startups

ExaProxy VS TinyProxy

Compare ExaProxy VS TinyProxy and see what are their differences

ExaProxy

ExaProxy is a a high-performance non-caching proxy.

Rating
0 reviews
TinyProxy

A lightweight http(s) proxy daemon

Rating
5.0 · 1 review

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, TinyProxy seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 8 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 8
Proxy Server popularity
68% vs 32%
alternatives listed
28 vs 102

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ExaProxy
TP
TinyProxy
Website github.com tinyproxy.github.io
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ExaProxy 5 features
TP
TinyProxy 5 features
  • Lightweight
    ExaProxy is designed to be lightweight, making it suitable for environments with limited resources where a full-featured proxy might be too demanding.
  • High Performance
    ExaProxy is capable of handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, offering high performance for demanding tasks.
  • Flexible Configuration
    ExaProxy provides flexibility in configuration, allowing users to tailor proxy settings to meet specific requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, ExaProxy allows users to inspect, modify, and enhance the code to fit their needs, offering transparency and community-driven support.
  • Python-based
    ExaProxy is written in Python, which makes it accessible to a wide range of developers familiar with the language and allows easy integration with other Python-based systems.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    Compared to some other proxies, ExaProxy might lack certain advanced features that are needed in more complex environments.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ExaProxy, it may not be as large or active as those of more established proxy solutions, potentially resulting in slower support and fewer resources.
  • Scalability Concerns
    In extreme high-load scenarios, ExaProxy may not scale as effectively as specialized, high-end commercial proxy servers designed for such tasks.
  • Learning Curve
    For users unfamiliar with Python or who lack experience with proxy server configurations, there might be a learning curve associated with deploying and managing ExaProxy.
  • Lightweight
    TinyProxy has a small footprint, making it highly efficient in terms of resource consumption.
  • Easy to Configure
    With a simple configuration file, TinyProxy is easy to set up and configure according to specific needs.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source solution, TinyProxy is free to use and can be modified to fit unique use cases.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    TinyProxy requires minimal dependencies, simplifying installation and maintenance on various systems.
  • HTTP Proxy Support
    It supports HTTP proxy functionality, making it suitable for basic web proxy needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    TinyProxy offers basic functionality and lacks more advanced features found in other proxy solutions.
  • Security Limitations
    Due to its minimalistic nature, TinyProxy has limited security features such as traffic encryption.
  • No Web UI
    TinyProxy does not come with a web-based user interface, making management less intuitive for some users.
  • Not Ideal for Large Scale
    Its lightweight design means it may not scale well for large enterprise environments compared to more robust proxy solutions.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
    The documentation can be sparse, making troubleshooting and advanced configuration challenging for new users.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

ExaProxy 0 videos + Add
TP
TinyProxy 1 video + Add

No ExaProxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

kodi recording nbc with ffmpeg without tinyproxy - kodi recording videos - 20

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ExaProxy
TP
TinyProxy
68% 68%
32% 32%
30% 30%
70% 70%
100% 100%
VPN
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using ExaProxy and TinyProxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

ExaProxy no reviews yet
TP
TinyProxy 5.0 · 1 review

We have no reviews of ExaProxy yet. Be the first one to post

  • It was easier to install and use than expected
    SaaSHub review
    · Feb 2020

    Super simple and straight to the point. All I had to do, in a linux server, was this: install it => apt install tinyproxy configure hosts allowed to connect reload configs => service tinyproxy reload

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ExaProxy 0 mentions
TP
TinyProxy 8 mentions

Tracking ExaProxy since Mar 2021.

  • Duct tape enough services together and you can cache APT packages
    The first result led me to TinyProxywhich was the exactly what I needed. It’s a small, proxy server that handles forwarding HTTPS requests, requiring almost zero configuration, and has on-going maintenance. Adding it to the container and... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Overcoming Geo-Blocked Feature Testing with Zero-Budget DevOps Strategies
    Leverage open-source proxy tools like mitmproxy or tinyproxy, which allow you to intercept and modify HTTP requests and responses in real-time. By configuring these, you can simulate different geo conditions:. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • I Add 3-25 Seconds of Latency to Every Page I Visit (2020)
    Probably by modifying the source code of https://tinyproxy.github.io (it's a lightweight proxy, but modifying the source would be not a 5-minute thing...). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to ExaProxy and TinyProxy

When comparing ExaProxy and TinyProxy, you can also consider the following products.