Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Errorception VS Bird Eats Bug

Compare Errorception VS Bird Eats Bug and see what are their differences

Errorception logo Errorception

Painless JavaScript Error Tracking

Bird Eats Bug logo Bird Eats Bug

Saw a bug? Send an instant replay to engineers. It will come with console logs and everything. Developers will ❤️ you.
  • Errorception Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15
  • Bird Eats Bug Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

Errorception features and specs

  • Real-Time Error Monitoring
    Errorception provides real-time monitoring of JavaScript errors, allowing developers to detect and address issues as they occur, minimizing downtime and improving user experience.
  • Lightweight and Easy Integration
    The platform offers a simple setup process and a lightweight client-side library, which can be easily integrated into existing projects with minimal overhead.
  • Detailed Error Reports
    Errorception provides detailed error reports with stack traces, user information, and environment details, helping developers quickly understand and fix issues.
  • Email Notifications
    Developers can receive email notifications for new errors, ensuring they are promptly informed about any issues affecting their applications.
  • Browser and OS Detection
    The platform can detect and report the browser and operating system of users experiencing errors, aiding in identifying environment-specific issues.

Possible disadvantages of Errorception

  • Limited to JavaScript Errors
    Errorception is focused specifically on JavaScript errors, which means it doesn't provide monitoring or insights into server-side issues or errors in other programming languages.
  • Dependency on Client-Side Library
    The service requires embedding a client-side library in the application, which could be a concern for projects aiming to minimize third-party dependencies or potential security vulnerabilities.
  • Scalability Concerns
    For large-scale applications with significant user traffic, there could be concerns regarding the scalability of error monitoring and reporting through Errorception.
  • Cost
    Depending on the plan and the scale of usage, the cost of using Errorception could be a consideration, particularly for startups or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Customization Limitations
    Some users may find the customization options for filtering and managing errors limited compared to more robust error tracking platforms.

Bird Eats Bug features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Bird Eats Bug features a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for non-technical team members to capture bug reports without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Bug Reports
    The tool automatically captures detailed context like console logs, network requests, and environmental information, reducing the back-and-forth between developers and testers.
  • Time-Saving
    Automated bug reporting tools like Bird Eats Bug streamline the process of capturing and documenting bugs, saving valuable time in the development cycle.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Bird Eats Bug integrates with popular project management tools such as Jira, GitHub, and Slack, allowing seamless workflow integration.
  • Collaboration
    Facilitates better communication between team members with sharable bug reports, enhancing team collaboration and productivity.

Possible disadvantages of Bird Eats Bug

  • Cost
    Bird Eats Bug is a paid tool, which could be a drawback for smaller teams or startups with tight budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    While generally user-friendly, some users might still experience a learning curve in understanding all the features and functionalities.
  • Performance Impact
    Recording and capturing detailed reports can sometimes lead to performance hits, especially on less powerful devices.
  • Dependency on Integrations
    The tool's effectiveness heavily relies on its integrations with other project management and communication tools. If these integrations fail or are not available for a particular service, the workflow could be disrupted.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Capturing detailed logs and session information could raise privacy concerns, especially in environments with sensitive data.

Errorception videos

errorception.com: Painless client-side JavaScript Error Tracking -Rakesh Pai

More videos:

  • Review - Architecture of Errorception by Rakesh Pai

Bird Eats Bug videos

Bird Eats Bug Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Errorception and Bird Eats Bug)
Error Tracking
23 23%
77% 77
Exception Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
QA
0 0%
100% 100
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Errorception and Bird Eats Bug. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bird Eats Bug seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Errorception mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Errorception yet. Tracking of Errorception recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Bird Eats Bug mentions (9)

  • Ask HN: Is there a tool / product that enables commenting on HTML elements?
    Our QA team uses https://birdeatsbug.com for testing and reporting bugs internally. Think it's similar to jam.dev that others have suggested. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • 12 Great Free Tools For Developers in 2022
    Bird Eats Bug — is an indispensable service for any developer (after all, everybody has bugs). Thanks to Bird you will get more information about the problems and detailed steps to fix them (including screenshots and screen recordings), which will save time and resources when making bug reports. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Looking for Engineers - Remote (UTC-4/+4)
    We are Bird Eats Bug, an early stage, VC backed tech startup (fully remote), founded 2019 in Berlin, currently counting 12 people. Source: over 3 years ago
  • I made a 1-click screen recording tool - got 20 registered users.
    Your talking about something like this right? https://birdeatsbug.com it’s a screen recorder specifically for reporting bugs. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2022)
    Bird Eats Bug | DevOps, Backend, Javascript Engineers | Remote in Europe | Full-time | https://birdeatsbug.com We are Bird Eats Bug, an early stage, VC backed tech startup (fully remote), founded 2019 in Berlin, currently counting 12 people. At Bird, we're solving a problem that is a pain for many, costs the industry billions and something we've probably all experienced at some point - software bugs. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Errorception and Bird Eats Bug, you can also consider the following products

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

BugHerd - BugHerd: The Website Feedback Tool for Agencies

TrackJS JavaScript Error Logging - JavaScript Error Monitoring from TrackJS gives you context about what's happening in your end-users' browsers.

Marker.io - Visual feedback and bug reporting tool for websites

Bugfender - Cloud logging for your apps, not only crashes matter

Instabug - The top apps in the world rely on Instabug for beta testing, user engagement and crash reporting.