Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Engrampa VS OrbStack

Compare Engrampa VS OrbStack and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Engrampa logo Engrampa

A file archiver for MATE, based on File Roller from GNOME 2 http://www.mate-desktop.org/

OrbStack logo OrbStack

Fast, light, simple Docker & Linux on macOS
  • Engrampa Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21
  • OrbStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-22

Engrampa features and specs

  • Integration with MATE Desktop
    Engrampa is a default archiver for the MATE Desktop Environment, offering seamless integration and a consistent user experience within the MATE interface.
  • Support for Multiple Formats
    Engrampa supports a wide range of archive formats like zip, tar, gzip, bzip2, and more, making it versatile for various compression needs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Its graphical user interface is straightforward and easy to use, catering to users who prefer GUI-based tools over command-line operations.
  • Free and Open Source
    Engrampa is open-source software, allowing users to contribute to its development, customize it, and use it freely without licensing costs.
  • Lightweight
    Designed to be lightweight, Engrampa is efficient in terms of system resource usage, making it suitable for older machines or those with limited resources.

Possible disadvantages of Engrampa

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other archiving tools, Engrampa might lack advanced features needed by power users, such as multi-volume archiving or automation scripts.
  • Primarily for MATE Users
    While it can be used outside of MATE, Engrampa is largely tailored to users of the MATE Desktop Environment, which might limit its appeal to users of other desktop environments.
  • Potential for Fewer Updates
    As a community-driven project, the frequency and scope of updates and enhancements might not be as robust as those provided by commercial software.
  • Relatively Niche User Base
    Since it's part of the MATE ecosystem, Engrampa might have a smaller user base compared to more ubiquitous archiving tools, potentially resulting in less community support.

OrbStack features and specs

  • Performance
    OrbStack is optimized for high performance, providing faster boot times and efficient resource usage compared to other virtualization platforms.
  • User Interface
    The platform offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface that simplifies management and set up of virtual machines and containers.
  • Integration
    OrbStack integrates well with various development tools and environments, enhancing workflow efficiency for developers.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple platforms, making it versatile and accessible for users across different operating systems.
  • Security
    The platform is designed with robust security features to protect virtualized environments and ensure data integrity.

Possible disadvantages of OrbStack

  • Limited Documentation
    Some users might find the available documentation scarce, making it harder to find solutions to specific issues or advanced configurations.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there may still be a learning curve for users who are new to virtualization technologies.
  • Pricing
    Depending on the licensing model, OrbStack can be costly for individual developers or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Resource Intensity
    Though efficient, the platform may require significant system resources, which could be a drawback for users with less powerful hardware.
  • Compatibility Issues
    While OrbStack supports various platforms, there might be occasional compatibility issues with specific hardware or software configurations.

Engrampa videos

The return of engrampa Thunar (Arch Linux)

OrbStack videos

OrbStack: A Lightweight Alternative for Docker

More videos:

  • Review - Practices for Docker on Mac Mini M2 Pro with OrbStack #mac #orbstack #docker #container

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Engrampa and OrbStack)
Archiver
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Archive Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Engrampa and OrbStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OrbStack seems to be a lot more popular than Engrampa. While we know about 36 links to OrbStack, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Engrampa. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Engrampa mentions (2)

  • TIL there's a fork of the unmaintained p7zip port of 7-Zip
    The p7zip port of 7-Zip is several releases behind and the project seems to be abandoned. I discovered this when a large archive failed to extract with Engrampa which uses it. It reported a "Headers Error" which is due to a compatibility problem between zip format implementations. 7-Zip has a fix but the port doesn't. But there's a fork on GitHub which is being actively maintained. Check it out. Source: over 4 years ago
  • What compression tool you mainly use?
    I use Engrampa. Which archive format I use depends on the use case. For example, if Windows users are involved, I usually use Rar archives. Under Linux, I usually use tar.xz. Source: over 5 years ago

OrbStack mentions (36)

  • Zed is 1.0
    You might find OrbStack useful here as a replacement for Docker Desktop. So much faster and uses way less resources: https://orbstack.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • How to Turn Any SaaS Into a Telegram Bot in 30 Minutes Using OpenClaw
    On macOS, I recommend OrbStack. It is lighter than Docker Desktop. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Run Docker and Kubernetes on your Apple Silicon in an Enterprise Environment
    There are a bunch of options to run containers locally on macOS. In addition to the dominant Docker Desktop, there are other excellent tools like OrbStack, Podman/Podman Desktop and even a solution from Apple starting with macOS 26 (Tahoe). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Red Hat takes on Docker Desktop with its enterprise Podman Desktop build
    Another alternative (although Mac OS-only) is [0] OrbStack. Some devs in my team are running it as a more performant alternative to Docker Desktop for Mac and they are very happy so far. [0]: https://orbstack.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Code and Let Live
    Have you tried https://orbstack.dev/? - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Engrampa and OrbStack, you can also consider the following products

The Unarchiver - Get the top application for archives on Mac. It's a RAR extractor, it allows you to unzip files, and works with dozens of other formats.

Podman Desktop - Containers and Kubernetes for application developers

Explzh for Windows - Powerful explorer-like archive software for Windows.

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

ArKiwi - A lightweight and very fast file archiver, where you can add, compress, extract, delete, password protect, and blazing fast search all your files.

Warp Terminal - The terminal for the 21st century. Warp is a blazingly fast, rust-based terminal reimagined from the ground up to work like a modern app.