EaseClaw
Apollo.io
Gojiberry AI
Clearbit
Lusha
Apollo.io
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
EaseClaw is a self-serve AI lead-finder for founders and B2B teams. You paste your website and an AI builds a profile of what you sell and who your ideal customer is. From there, an agent monitors platforms like Reddit, X, Hacker News, Stack Overflow, Quora, Product Hunt, LinkedIn and more โ 24/7 โ for people describing the exact problem you solve.
Every matching post is scored 0โ100 by buying intent, and the highest-intent ones get a ready-to-send reply drafted in your voice. Leads and drafts land in a dashboard and email digests, and teams can connect MCP clients through an API and CLI to pull scored leads and draft replies. The human always reviews and sends โ EaseClaw never auto-posts, so your reputation stays yours. Plans start at $49/mo with a $9 7-day trial.
EaseClaw ClearbitNo EaseClaw videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Clearbit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Gojiberry AI - Gojiberry tracks buyer intent signals across the web and enriches profiles with emails & phone numbers, so you reach the right leads, at the right time.