Dropbox Reviews

1. Lily1010

   about 6 years ago
   good cloud service

   It's much more convenient than GoogleDrive. I frequently use it to share my projects on freelance platforms. This is reliable cloud storage with many features

   🏁 Competitors: Google Drive

   👍 Pros:    Reliable|Convenient|Easy to use

   👎 Cons:    Found none

Temporal Reviews

Dropbox mentions (28)

• Excel What if Analysis Issue

  Even better: upload an example Excel file to a file-sharing website (box.net/files, dropbox.com, onedrive.live.com, etc), and post a download link that does not require that we log in. Source: over 2 years ago

• How to save data on Obsidian? Worried about data loss

  Note that Dropbox automatically backs up all your files. So if you delete a file, you can recover it on dropbox.com, even 6 months later. Source: about 3 years ago

• How long would a USB stick last in storage?

  Upload what is on that stick to a cloud based system that is not vulnerable to degradation of hardware, you can get a lot of storage for free on sites like dropbox.com, mega.nz, or icloud. You can also always make multiple backups. Source: about 3 years ago

• Dropbox data gone

  Did you try logging into dropbox.com and checking there? Often the files remain online even if they are removed locallY. You have to log in with the same account you deleted Locally. Source: about 3 years ago

• Author Resources: Tools and Software

  Dropbox: You absolutely NEED backups. Ideally, both physical and cloud backups, because if you only have one backup, you're not backed up. I can't even begin to tell you how many writers have lost days, weeks, or even entire novels worth of work because they failed to back up their work, then had their computer break or had some weird software snafu. Dropbox is my preferred cloud backup solution, because you can... Source: about 3 years ago

Temporal mentions (17)

• Temporal in Production: Sharp Edges & Good Practices

  When a team moves from a monolith into microservices and event-driven, asynchronous systems, it inherits a class of problems that used to be someone else's: work that fails halfway through, steps that must not run twice, calls that return before the work is done. Temporal is a durable execution engine that handles a lot of this - you define a multi-step process, and it guarantees the process runs to completion... - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago

• Your Agent Bills While It Waits. Here's the Fix.

  Durable execution — the pattern implemented by Temporal, Inngest, Rivet Actors, and now Cloudflare Workflows — treats waiting as a continuation rather than a loop:. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago

• Compiler as Custodian

  Two specific moves stand out in Duncan's account. The first is durable execution, via Temporal — Mercury replaced fragile cron-and-database state machines with workflow code whose failure semantics are platform-handled (replay, retry, timeout, cancellation). Mercury open-sourced its hs-temporal-sdk, which wraps Temporal's official Rust Core SDK via FFI and provides a Haskell-native API. The dovetail with Haskell's... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

• How we turned our workflow editor into a real SDK

  We picked Temporal as the first reference engine on purpose. Temporal has the strictest execution model we know of – a V8 sandbox, determinism constraints, replay-driven recovery. If our port contract holds up against that, easier engines – an in-memory test double, a BullMQ queue, or JSON-first platforms like Inngest or Restate – plug in through the same two interfaces. We're shipping Temporal first; the rest is... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• Three days debugging a missing trace

  The trick is to find whatever metadata channel the queue already gives you and use that and thankfully, almost every mature queue has one (probably because of this scenario). SQS has message attributes, Temporal has context propagators built into the SDK, and Hatchet (which we use to run our workflows) has a metadata field called additionalMetadata. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago