DocRaptor VS Waysorted
Compare DocRaptor VS Waysorted and see what are their differences
Financial decision-making for Shopify brands, connecting sales and marketing to show what drives profit - and what to do next.
sponsored
DocRaptor
PDFShift
PDFCrowd
pdflayer
Api2Pdf
HTML PDF API
HTML2PDF.fr
PDFMonkey
Waysorted
Magicul.io
Convertify
html.to.design
Iconify Design
Stark for Figma
Only DocRaptor's HTML-to-PDF API has these advanced styling and layout capabilities:
Instead of a separate HTML file, DocRaptor headers and footers are part of your document HTML. And easily show (or hide) different headers and footers for different pages.
DocRaptor lets you control the style, sizing, headers, and layouts of individual pages in your document. You can even style left and right pages differently, or the first and last pages.
DocRaptor lets you make PDFs with advanced CSS layout tools, including flexbox. You won't need to radically adjust your website to get a great PDF.
Create more accessible PDFs by using PDF profiles PDF/A-1a, PDF/A-3a, or PDF/UA-1. Tagged PDFs optimize the reading experience for assistive technology such as screen readers.
Our rendering engine was built specifically for making PDFs and we fully support CSS3 Paged Media. This allows much greater control over page breaks, especially when dealing with tables and images.
Add crop marks, specify PDF bookmarks, or create standards-compliant documents.
We back our API with a 99.999% uptime guarantee. If you need reliability, DocRaptor is the service you can trust. We also have no limits on document input or output size.
One plugin instead of a dozen. Waysorted brings export, import, conversion and design-system work into a single Figma toolkit — so you stop hunting for the right plugin and losing your place on the canvas.
Free to start — new accounts get 100 credits. Credits can be topped up with no subscription, or a monthly plan adds a recurring allowance. Current pricing: https://www.waysorted.com/pricing
Built by Waysorted Infotech Pvt Ltd, a member of the NVIDIA Inception program.
DocRaptor WaysortedWaysorted's answer:
Most Figma plugins solve one problem, so a working file ends up depending on five or six of them, each with its own subscription and its own way of doing things. Waysorted puts seven of those jobs behind one plugin: exporting frames to PDF, importing AI/EPS/PSD/PDF files, converting HTML into editable layers, building colour palettes with WCAG and APCA contrast checks, converting units, browsing an SVG icon library, and summarising comment threads.
Two things follow from that. Billing is one credit balance across every tool rather than a separate plan per plugin, so you pay for what you actually use. And PDF export runs entirely on your device — the plugin declares no network access for it, so client work never leaves your machine to be rendered on someone else's server.
Waysorted's answer:
Most of the alternatives here are one-job plugins, and they are good at their job — html.to.design converts pages, Magicul and Convertify handle file conversion, Iconify does icons, Stark does contrast. The cost only shows up later: a real working file ends up depending on four or five of them, which means four or five subscriptions and four or five different ideas about where the settings live.
Waysorted is the argument for consolidating. Seven of those jobs sit behind one plugin — frames to PDF, AI/EPS/PSD/PDF import, HTML into editable layers, colour palettes with WCAG and APCA contrast checks, unit conversion, an SVG icon library, and comment-thread summaries. One credit balance covers all of them, spent per use rather than per tool, so a month where you only export PDFs does not also pay for icon search.
Two differences worth knowing beyond the bundling. PDF export runs entirely on your device — the plugin declares no network access for it, so client work is never uploaded to be rendered on someone else's server. And contrast is checked against both WCAG 2 and APCA rather than one or the other, which matters because a palette can pass one and fail the other.
Free to start with 100 credits, top-ups without a subscription, or a monthly allowance if you use it regularly: https://www.waysorted.com/pricing
Waysorted's answer:
Product and UI designers who work in Figma every day and hand their work to someone else — a client, a stakeholder, a developer, a printer. That handoff is where these tools cluster: exporting frames as a review PDF, packaging screens for a weekly stakeholder review, checking a palette against WCAG and APCA before sign-off, converting units so a spec matches what actually gets built.
In practice that skews toward freelancers and small studios doing client work, where the same person does the design and the delivery and nobody else is going to assemble the PDF. Larger in-house teams use it for the same handoff steps, usually the export and contrast parts.
The other consistent group is anyone redesigning something that already exists, who needs a live page as editable layers rather than a screenshot to trace over.
The common thread: none of these are the job people open Figma to do. They are the work around the work, which is why bundling them behind one plugin and one credit balance makes more sense than a subscription each. Guides for these workflows are at https://www.waysorted.com/blogs
I've been using it for a while. It's great to create contracts.
We wanted an app that would allow for custom branding and layout, the font of our choice, and merge fields across our main SF objects. Previously we used DocGen, which led to a morass of configuration to put fields in exactly the place they needed to be for the tables, as well as a bunch of SOQL queries to manage conditional logic. The VF doc generator can't accommodate the fonts we use in our branding. And so DocRaptor has been the perfect solution.
Our developer built the contracts, and we went live within weeks with complete branding, flexibility in the data merges (we were able to remove a ton of bad config) and it's easy to manage.
I have been using DocRaptor for 6 years, both for my professionnal and personnal projects. After trying several free and/or open source HTML to PDF solutions, I was happy to find this service. It's the most efficient solution, which generates the most accurate PDF documents.
Since it's a SaaS service, there is nothing to install, no library dependencies nor experimental software that you're not sure it will be supported in the future.
There is a lot of options and CSS rules to dig in if you want to get PDF files that exactly matches what you want. But the other solutions I tried didn't have these options, and the result was not good enough.
Based on our record, DocRaptor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The commercial sibling of this category is PrinceXML (and DocRaptor, The hosted API built on it) — the strongest print-CSS engine on the market and the reference Choice when compliance-grade, print-perfect documents justify the price. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
It sounds like this is as advanced as DocRaptor[1]. They have what I consider to be the best PDF generation API, giving complete control over the documents you need to create. The pricing is similar. If you'd rather do it for free weasyprint[2] is the best open source alternative. Another more affordable option you might want to consider is Urlbox[3]. (Disclosure: I work on this) Urlbox's rendering engine is based... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
We built the DocRaptor API to let developers have affordable access to the commercial Prince PDF engine. We have Node code examples throughout the documentation. Source: almost 4 years ago
I'd argue our service, DocRaptor, is the best because it's the only one powered by the Prince PDF engine. Unlike open-source, browser-based conversion engines, Prince was custom-built just for converting HTML into PDFs and offers a lot of unique functionality for making more complex PDFs. Source: over 4 years ago
I work for https://docraptor.com, which is an HTML to PDF API. We have a C# agent. Source: about 5 years ago
PDFShift - Convert any HTML documents to high-fidelity PDF using a single POST request
Magicul.io - Convert between Adobe XD, Figma, PDF, Illustrator, Sketch and more with 1 click
PDFCrowd - Pdfcrowd is a Web/HTML to PDF online service. Convert HTML to PDF online in the browser or in your PHP, Python, Ruby, .NET, Java apps via the REST API.
Convertify - Convert your website to an iOS and Android app
pdflayer - Free, powerful HTML to PDF API supporting both URL and raw HTML conversion. Unlimited document size, lightning-fast and compatible PHP, Python, Ruby, etc.
html.to.design - Convert any website into fully editable Figma designs