Do Some Gaming VS git-sizer

• Wide Game Selection
  Do Some Gaming offers a diverse range of games across multiple genres, catering to different gaming preferences and interests.
• User-Friendly Interface
  The website is designed with easy navigation in mind, making it simple for users to find and access their favorite games.
• Frequent Updates
  The platform regularly updates its game library with new titles and features, ensuring that users have access to the latest gaming experiences.
• Community Engagement
  Do Some Gaming encourages user interaction and engagement through forums, reviews, and social media integration.

Possible disadvantages

• Subscription Fee
  Access to premium games and features on Do Some Gaming may require a subscription fee, which could be a drawback for some users.
• High System Requirements
  Some games available on the platform may require high system specifications, limiting access for users with older or less powerful hardware.
• Limited Offline Access
  The platform primarily focuses on online gaming, so offline access to games is limited or unavailable.
• Potential for Slow Load Times
  Due to a large number of users or high data demands, some users might experience slow load times occasionally.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Tracking Do Some Gaming since Nov 2024.

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago