JavaScript Library for cross-platform web and mobile app development with HTML5 JavaScript widgets. Easy integration with popular JavaScript Frameworks.
Notes, tasks, passwords, journal, files, calendar, contacts and bookmarks, with mood and medication tracking. Encrypted on your device. Open source, no ads, no trackers. Free forever; Pro is a one-time purchase.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Logseq
seems to be a lot more popular than DHTMLX.
While we know about 300 links to Logseq,
we've tracked only 1 mention of DHTMLX.
social mentions
1 vs 300
Javascript UI Libraries popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
77 vs 240+
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Comprehensive Suite DHTMLX offers a wide range of UI components, from grids and charts to complex Gantt and scheduler components, providing a comprehensive toolkit for web application development.
Rich Documentation The platform provides extensive documentation, demos, and examples, which are invaluable for developers in understanding and implementing various components efficiently.
Cross-Browser Compatibility DHTMLX components are designed to be fully compatible across major browsers, ensuring a consistent user experience regardless of the user's environment.
Support and Community DHTMLX offers various support options including forums and ticket-based support, alongside a strong user community that can provide insights and assistance.
Customizability The components are highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor them to fit the specific aesthetics and functionality requirements of their projects.
Possible disadvantages
Cost While DHTMLX provides a free version, the full suite with advanced features requires a paid license, which can be a drawback for startups or individual developers with limited budgets.
Complexity With its comprehensive set of features, DHTMLX can have a steep learning curve for newcomers who are unfamiliar with its architecture and functionalities.
Dependency on Proprietary Framework Using DHTMLX can lead to a dependency on its particular frameworks and methodologies, which might be a concern for projects that prioritize open-source solutions.
Performance Overhead Implementing multiple DHTMLX components in a single application might introduce performance overhead, which requires optimization to maintain responsiveness.
Limited Open Source Contributions As a commercial library, DHTMLX might not benefit from as many open source contributions and innovations as purely open-source alternatives.
Bidirectional Linking Logseq allows users to easily create bidirectional links between notes, enhancing organization and navigation through related information.
Graph View The graph view provides a visual representation of how notes are interconnected, helping users see the bigger picture of their knowledge network.
Markdown Support Logseq supports Markdown, making it easy to format notes and write in a widely-used plain text format.
Local Storage Notes are stored locally, giving users full control over their data and enhancing privacy and security.
Customizable Workflows Users can customize their workflows with plugins and templates to suit their specific needs and preferences.
Open Source Being an open-source project, Logseq invites community contributions and ensures more transparency in development and issue resolution.
Task Management Logseq integrates task management features, such as to-do lists and scheduling, directly within notes, improving productivity.
Possible disadvantages
Learning Curve New users may find Logseq's extensive features and unique workflow approach challenging to learn without dedicated time and effort.
Sync Complexity While storing notes locally is a pro for privacy, it requires additional tools or manual methods to sync notes across multiple devices.
Mobile App Limitations The mobile version of Logseq is still in development, meaning it may lack some features and fluidity found in the desktop version.
Resource Intensive Logseq can consume considerable system resources, particularly when dealing with large datasets or extensive use of graph view.
Community Dependency As an open-source project, certain features may rely on community contributions, which could lead to inconsistent updates or support.
Customization Complexity While high customization is a benefit, it can become overwhelming and complex to manage for users who prefer a more straightforward tool.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
DHTMLXLogseq
No analysis of DHTMLX yet.
Overall verdict
Yes, Logseq is generally considered a good tool, particularly for individuals seeking a robust, free-form method of organizing notes and knowledge that goes beyond traditional hierarchical models.
Why this product is good
Logseq is a versatile tool for managing notes and knowledge using a graph-based interface similar to networked thought processing. It offers features like linked references, back-linking, and support for Markdown and org-mode, making it a valuable tool for those who value interconnected note-taking. Its open-source nature ensures constant community-driven improvements and transparency, encouraging a strong user community.
Recommended for
Students and researchers who manage a large volume of interconnected notes.
Professionals who require a flexible and dynamic knowledge management system.
Writers and content creators looking for a tool to visualize ideas and concepts.
Tech enthusiasts and developers who appreciate open-source software.
Logseq is a powerful and advanced tool for thought that has been gaining attention among note-taking enthusiasts and productivity seekers. In this article, we will provide an overview of Logseq, explore what users can...
Outliners (think Workflowy, Roam, Logseq) rely on blocks and indentation for primary connections, and references to other blocks or pages for richer links. They’re optimized for capturing quick thinking.
Refined user interface: Logseq offers a refined user interface that is easy to understand and pleasing to the eyes. On the other hand, Obsidian looks like a jumble of various UI elements which are hard to figure out...
To finish projects on time, efficient time management is a must. To help managers deal with deadlines, we usually implement a fully functional Gantt chart. To create a reliable and user-friendly UI, choosing the right set of tools is...
- Source: dev.to
/
almost 5 years ago
Using Logseq[1][2] for years and quite happy with it, especially since it has apps for tablets/iPad and phones as well, while being completely FOSS. [1] https://logseq.com/ [2] https://github.com/logseq/logseq.
- Source: Hacker News
/
4 months ago
Choose a local Markdown tool like Obsidian, Logseq, Foam, or Tolaria to store all your knowledge as plain .md files you own and control.
- Source: dev.to
/
6 months ago
Forgetful gets procedural and prospective memory
I should call out another thing that convinced me was a user of forgetful (twsta) posted in the discord a skill for managing wok and todos from how they used to use Logseq.
- Source: dev.to
/
8 months ago
High performance web components for SaaS apps - including Gantt, Scheduler, Grid, Calendar and Kanban widgets. Seamless integration with React, Vue, Angular or plain JS apps.
Sencha Ext JS is the most comprehensive JavaScript framework for building data-intensive, cross-platform web and mobile applications for any modern device. Ext JS includes 140+ pre-integrated and tested high-performance UI components.
Joplin is a free, open source note taking and to-do application, which can handle a large number of notes organised into notebooks. The notes are searchable, tagged and modified either from the applications directly or from your own text editor.
Bryntum
jQuery
Sencha Ext JS
Webix UI
AG Grid
Zepto.js
SVAR UI
Obsidian
Notion
Joplin
Evernote
Anytype.io
Roam Research
Standard Notes
