D (Programming Language) VS Quicksilver

• Performance
  D is designed to be a high-performance systems programming language, offering performance comparable to C and C++ through native machine code compilation.
• Expressiveness
  D features a rich standard library and modern language constructs, such as garbage collection, first-class arrays, and advanced templating, making it easier to write expressive and maintainable code.
• Memory Safety
  D offers optional garbage collection along with manual memory management. This hybrid approach can help in developing safer applications by reducing memory-related errors.
• Interoperability
  D can easily interoperate with C API, enabling seamless integration with existing C libraries and systems. It also supports better C++ interoperability compared to other languages.
• Built-in Unit Testing
  D has built-in support for unit tests, allowing developers to write and run tests as part of the language itself, facilitating test-driven development.
• Concurrency
  D offers built-in concurrency support with message passing, similar to the actor model found in languages like Erlang, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs.

Possible disadvantages

• Adoption
  D is not as widely adopted as other languages like C, C++, or Java. This limited adoption means fewer libraries, frameworks, and community support.
• Toolchain Maturity
  While D's compilers and tools have improved over the years, they may still lack the maturity and feature set of more established languages, which can affect developer productivity.
• Learning Curve
  D's richness and combination of paradigms (such as imperative, object-oriented, and functional programming) can present a steep learning curve for new developers.
• Garbage Collection
  Although D offers optional garbage collection, its reliance on it for memory safety might be seen as a drawback for real-time system development where deterministic memory management is crucial.
• Ecosystem
  The ecosystem for D is less vibrant compared to more popular languages, leading to potentially fewer third-party libraries, tools, and resources.
• Standard Library Documentation
  The standard library documentation can be inconsistent or less comprehensive compared to other languages, making it difficult for developers to fully utilize all features of the language.

• Efficiency
  Quicksilver allows users to quickly launch applications and search for files, significantly speeding up workflow.
• Customization
  Highly customizable with various plugins and triggers, enabling users to tailor the tool to fit their exact needs.
• Free
  Quicksilver is open-source and free to use, making it accessible for everyone without any cost.
• Simplicity
  The user interface is clean and intuitive, which makes the tool easy to learn and use effectively.
• Integrations
  Strong integration with numerous other applications and services, which enhances its functionality and usefulness.

Possible disadvantages

• Mac-only
  Quicksilver is only available for macOS, limiting its usage to users who are on this operating system.
• Learning Curve
  While basic use is straightforward, leveraging advanced features can require a significant amount of time to learn and set up.
• Performance
  Some users report that Quicksilver can be slow or unstable at times, particularly when running complex or numerous plugins.
• Limited Community
  The user community is relatively small compared to more popular tools, which can affect the availability of support and the development of new plugins.
• Dependency on Plugins
  Many advanced features require plugins, which means that the full potential of the tool isn't available out-of-the-box and requires additional setup.

D Language Tutorial

CAPITAL ONE QUICKSILVER REVIEW 2020

More videos

We have no reviews of D (Programming Language) yet. Be the first one to post

• 7 Best Alfred Alternatives To Maximize Your Productivity
  blaze.today · Apr 2022

  Quicksilver is a macOS productivity app that helps users perform everyday tasks much faster. It helps you keep track of your files and allows for the usage of various useful plugins.

• 4 Best Spotlight Alternatives to Increase Your Mac’s Functionality
  techpp.com · Apr 2022

  In terms of usability, searching for items in QuickSilver is a little different than most application launchers. Rather than entering your query in the search window, here, you need to first enter the query in the...

• Ask HN: What is your (AI) dev tech stack / workflow? (June 2026)

  I've spent 2 weeks (2-4h per day) to make D language[1] version of Sciter SDK [2] Choice of AI "tooling" was by accident - typed something like "how to define copy constructor in D for custom structure" in Microsoft's Copilot in Edge... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go

  > Mostly, I am not really trying to compete with C/C++/Rust on speed, but I'm not going to add a GC either. So I'm somewhere in there. Out of curiosity, how would you compare the goals of Rue with something like D[0] or one of the... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Pony: An actor-model, capabilities-secure, high-performance programming language

  The D language home page has something similar with a drop down with code examples https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

• An Alfred workflow to open GCP services and browse resources within

  Quicksilver [0] and Alfred [1] are versatile search/launchers for macOS, combining aspects of Spotlight, Launchpad, Finder, and a CLI. You hit a trigger key combination, and you're presented with an app that can interact via keystrokes... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Apple Needs a Snow Sequoia

  I still use Quicksilver[1], the open source app that long predates Alfred and was the inspiration for it. I tried Alfred a few years ago but didn't see anything compelling enough to switch. Am I missing anything? [1] https://qsapp.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Building a desktop launcher

  I still use QuickSilver on my mac, despite there are multiple efforts attempting to displace it. There used to be one made for Linux, called Gnome Do, however the development eventually stopped. I settled for the built-in launcher in... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more