D (Programming Language) VS HashLink

• Performance
  D is designed to be a high-performance systems programming language, offering performance comparable to C and C++ through native machine code compilation.
• Expressiveness
  D features a rich standard library and modern language constructs, such as garbage collection, first-class arrays, and advanced templating, making it easier to write expressive and maintainable code.
• Memory Safety
  D offers optional garbage collection along with manual memory management. This hybrid approach can help in developing safer applications by reducing memory-related errors.
• Interoperability
  D can easily interoperate with C API, enabling seamless integration with existing C libraries and systems. It also supports better C++ interoperability compared to other languages.
• Built-in Unit Testing
  D has built-in support for unit tests, allowing developers to write and run tests as part of the language itself, facilitating test-driven development.
• Concurrency
  D offers built-in concurrency support with message passing, similar to the actor model found in languages like Erlang, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs.

Possible disadvantages

• Adoption
  D is not as widely adopted as other languages like C, C++, or Java. This limited adoption means fewer libraries, frameworks, and community support.
• Toolchain Maturity
  While D's compilers and tools have improved over the years, they may still lack the maturity and feature set of more established languages, which can affect developer productivity.
• Learning Curve
  D's richness and combination of paradigms (such as imperative, object-oriented, and functional programming) can present a steep learning curve for new developers.
• Garbage Collection
  Although D offers optional garbage collection, its reliance on it for memory safety might be seen as a drawback for real-time system development where deterministic memory management is crucial.
• Ecosystem
  The ecosystem for D is less vibrant compared to more popular languages, leading to potentially fewer third-party libraries, tools, and resources.
• Standard Library Documentation
  The standard library documentation can be inconsistent or less comprehensive compared to other languages, making it difficult for developers to fully utilize all features of the language.

• Cross-Platform Compatibility
  HashLink allows developers to run Haxe programs on multiple platforms without changing the code, making it versatile for different environments.
• High Performance
  HashLink is designed to be fast, providing near-native performance by compiling Haxe code to C and then to a native binary.
• Debugging Support
  HashLink offers integrated debugging capabilities, enabling developers to troubleshoot issues effectively within their Haxe applications.
• Open Source
  HashLink is open-source, allowing developers to view, modify, and contribute to its codebase, fostering a community-driven approach to development.
• Interoperability with C Libraries
  HashLink supports easy integration with existing C libraries, allowing developers to leverage a wide array of pre-existing functionalities.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Documentation
  The documentation for HashLink may not be as comprehensive as needed, leading to a steeper learning curve for new developers.
• Smaller Community
  HashLink has a smaller user base compared to some other technologies, which can result in less community support and fewer third-party resources.
• Platform-Specific Issues
  While HashLink supports multiple platforms, there may be platform-specific issues that developers need to address, which can add to development time.
• Less Mature Ecosystem
  Being a relatively new technology, HashLink might lack certain tools or libraries that are readily available in more established ecosystems.
• Performance Dependence on Haxe
  Though HashLink itself is optimized for performance, its efficiency can be heavily dependent on how well the original Haxe code is written.

D Language Tutorial

NFT Hashlink Project Site Full Review|| Amazing Site Link.

More videos

• Ask HN: What is your (AI) dev tech stack / workflow? (June 2026)

  I've spent 2 weeks (2-4h per day) to make D language[1] version of Sciter SDK [2] Choice of AI "tooling" was by accident - typed something like "how to define copy constructor in D for custom structure" in Microsoft's Copilot in Edge... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go

  > Mostly, I am not really trying to compete with C/C++/Rust on speed, but I'm not going to add a GC either. So I'm somewhere in there. Out of curiosity, how would you compare the goals of Rue with something like D[0] or one of the... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Pony: An actor-model, capabilities-secure, high-performance programming language

  The D language home page has something similar with a drop down with code examples https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

View more

• 3D and 2D: Testing out my cross-platform graphics engine

  > The point of Haxe seems to be as a meta-compiler to generate code for a bunch of different languages/compilers? That's basically correct, although there is also a cross platform runtime called Hashlink but is unsupported by Kha.... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Ask HN: Does anyone here use Haxe?

  The person who made Haxe (Nicolas Canesse) went on to found Shiro Games (https://shirogames.com), a game development company. I believe all their games are made in Haxe. The latest one, "Dune: Spice Wars" was released this September and... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• Data Science in Julia for Hackers

  The problem I seem with sysimages, is that the whole process is incredibly unergonomic for exploratory coding, which Julia always claims it is a primary use-case for. When you want to just glue some packages and quickly test out some... - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago