Software Alternatives & Startups

Cyberduck VS mruby

Compare Cyberduck VS mruby and see what are their differences

Cyberduck

A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
mruby

Game Development

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Cyberduck should be more popular than mruby. It has been mentioned 73 times since March 2021.

social mentions
73 vs 8
Cloud Storage popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 18

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Cyberduck
mruby
Website cyberduck.io mruby.org
Pricing
Open source
—
Company Startup from Switzerland —
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Cyberduck 6 features
mruby 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Cyberduck features a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and manage files across different cloud storage services and servers.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    The software supports a variety of protocols including FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, and Backblaze B2, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Open Source
    Cyberduck is open-source, which means it is freely available and continuously improved by a community of developers.
  • Integration with External Editors
    Cyberduck allows seamless integration with various external editors, enabling users to edit files directly on the server.
  • Bookmark Management
    The application offers robust bookmark management, allowing users to easily save and organize frequently accessed locations.
  • Strong Security Features
    Cyberduck includes strong security features such as support for SSH keys, two-factor authentication, and encrypted transfers with TLS/SSL.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow transfer speeds and occasional freezes, especially when handling large files.
  • Resource Intensive
    Cyberduck can be resource-intensive, consuming a considerable amount of system memory and CPU, which can affect the performance of other applications.
  • Limited Support for Automation
    Unlike some other file transfer tools, Cyberduck lacks extensive built-in scripting or automation capabilities, which could be a drawback for power users looking to automate file operations.
  • Complex Initial Setup
    For users who are not familiar with the protocols supported, the initial setup and configuration can be confusing and time-consuming.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Some users have experienced occasional stability issues, including unexpected crashes or connection drops during transfers.
  • Lightweight
    mruby is designed to be small and lightweight, making it ideal for embedding in applications with limited resources.
  • Embeddable
    mruby can be easily embedded into software applications, allowing developers to script functionalities within the application.
  • Fast Execution
    It provides quick startup and execution times compared to many typical Ruby implementations, which enhances performance in resource-constrained environments.
  • Simple License
    mruby is distributed under a simple and permissive license (MIT License), which is business-friendly and promotes wide adoption.
  • Compatibility with Ruby Syntax
    mruby aims to be compatible with Ruby syntax, making it easier for developers familiar with Ruby to adopt and use it.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Standard Library
    mruby has a more limited standard library compared to full Ruby implementations, which can restrict development or require additional effort to implement missing features.
  • Less Mature
    Being a smaller and newer implementation, it might lack the robustness and extensive library support seen in more mature Ruby versions like MRI.
  • Less Community Support
    The community around mruby is smaller compared to the broader Ruby community, potentially leading to fewer resources or third-party libraries.
  • Incompatibility with Some Ruby Gems
    Not all Ruby gems are compatible with mruby, as some rely on native extensions or parts of the Ruby standard library that are absent in mruby.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    The debugging and profiling tools available for mruby are not as extensive as those available for regular Ruby, which can make troubleshooting more challenging.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Cyberduck 1 video + Add
mruby 0 videos + Add

How to Use Cyberduck FTP Client

No mruby videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Cyberduck
mruby
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
OOP
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Cyberduck and mruby. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Cyberduck no reviews yet
mruby no reviews yet
  • 10 Best FTP Clients for WordPress Users (Mac and Windows)
    kinsta.com · Jun 2022

    Cyberduck doesn’t provide support for Linux, but Mac and Windows users find it rather simple to use and fast for transferring files to and from local and remote locations. Feel free to download the FTP client from the...

  • 15 Best Rclone Alternatives 2022
    rigorousthemes.com · Apr 2022

    Furthermore, Cyberduck integrates with Cryptomator – one of the rclone alternatives mentioned earlier. With the Cryptomator integration, you get access to extra features like filename encryption and file content...

  • 7 Best FileZilla Alternatives to Use in 2022
    techdator.net · Feb 2022

    Cyberduck offers a clean user interface which is very easy to use. Most of the web developers use Cyberduck FTP client. However, it is recommended for Mac users, which can be accessed for free. Using this app is...

View more

We have no reviews of mruby yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Cyberduck 73 mentions
mruby 8 mentions

View more

  • Embed mruby as a Single Binary That Runs Everywhere
    I already have lua embeded into Rapidforge binary because lets admit it after certain size its very difficult to code with bash. I wanted to support mruby as well becuase I really love ruby and I think you can express complex ideas... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Playing with DragonRuby Game Toolkit (DRGTK)
    This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Natalie – a work-in-progress Ruby compiler, written in Ruby and C++
    > I guess the standard Ruby compiler doesn't allow you to spit out binaries Ruby is an interpreted language (+ JIT compiler). I wonder what makes this different from mruby[1] which seems to be very well supported for many years. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Cyberduck and mruby

When comparing Cyberduck and mruby, you can also consider the following products.