Build and integrate a WYSIWYG editor in minutes. Eddyter offers fast setup, developer-friendly APIs, and seamless content editing for modern web apps today.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Fluid might be a bit more popular than
Cubic.
We know about 19 links to it since March 2021
and only 14 links to Cubic.
social mentions
14 vs 19
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
169 vs 78
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
User-Friendly Interface Cubic provides a straightforward and intuitive interface, making it accessible even for users with limited experience in creating or customizing Linux ISOs.
Customizability Cubic allows users to easily customize Ubuntu-based distributions by installing software, tweaking settings, and adding files directly into the ISO image.
Real-time Preview The application provides a real-time preview of the ISO being customized, helping users to visualize the final product and make adjustments as necessary.
Enhanced Control Over Packages Cubic facilitates easy manipulation of package lists, including the ability to add, remove, or enable specific repositories for package installation.
Possible disadvantages
Limited to Ubuntu-based Distributions Cubic is specifically designed for customizing Ubuntu and its derivatives, meaning it is not suitable for other Linux distributions.
Requires Linux Knowledge Despite its user-friendly interface, Cubic still requires a basic understanding of Linux commands and environment to make effective customizations.
Dependency on Ubuntu Packages Customizations are reliant on packages available within Ubuntu’s repositories, which may limit the scope of modifications for users who require non-Ubuntu packages.
Performance and Resource Limitations Running Cubic can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory usage, especially during intensive operations like large package installs or complex customization scripts.
Dedicated Browsers Fluid creates site-specific browsers that allow users to have dedicated apps for their favorite web pages. This can enhance focus and organization by keeping tasks separate from regular web browsing.
Custom User Experience Each Site Specific Browser (SSB) can have a custom icon and name, providing a more personalized and aesthetically pleasing user interface.
Resource Management Having dedicated apps for regularly used web services can minimize the use of browser tabs and extensions, potentially leading to better performance and resource management.
Independence from Web Browser Fluid apps are independent of the main web browser. This means that if your browser crashes or has issues, your Fluid apps remain unaffected.
Enhanced Productivity By converting web apps into standalone desktop applications, users can more easily compartmentalize their work, leading to enhanced productivity.
Possible disadvantages
Limited to MacOS Fluid is available only for MacOS, which limits its usability to Mac users and excludes users on other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
Manual Updates Users need to manually update each Site Specific Browser (SSB) created through Fluid, as these do not automatically update like regular browser tabs.
Security Risks As Fluid apps are essentially wrappers for web pages, they are subject to the same security risks as any web browser. Users need to ensure they are visiting trusted sites.
Limited Functionality Unlike full-fledged desktop applications, Fluid apps might have limited native functionality. They rely heavily on the web app's own features and may lack advanced desktop integrations.
Cost for Full Features While Fluid is free to use, certain advanced features, such as pinning apps to the status bar, require a one-time purchase of Fluid's paid version.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
CubicFluid
No analysis of Cubic yet.
Overall verdict
Fluid is a good option for macOS users who find themselves frequently switching between web applications and want a more streamlined process. It's especially useful for those who prefer to keep web app sessions isolated or those who enjoy customizing their workflows. However, consider that it is only available for macOS and may not support all features of more complex web applications.
Why this product is good
Fluid (fluidapp.com) allows users to create site-specific browsers, which can be useful for treating web applications as standalone apps on macOS. This can help with productivity by preventing web distractions and organizing workflows. Fluid is particularly beneficial if you frequently use web apps and want them to function like native applications with their own dock icons and separate sessions.
Recommended for
MacOS users looking to create desktop-like experiences for web applications.
Individuals seeking to minimize distractions from other open tabs in a standard browser.
Users who need isolated sessions for different web applications.
People who appreciate customizing their desktop workflow.
With a strong focus on simplicity and communication, Fluid UI great Prototyping tools. Having built-in high and low fidelity component libraries, live team collaboration, device previews and video presentations making...
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
Cubic14 mentionsFluid19 mentions
How to make your own distro?
To remaster Ubuntu you can use Cubic which is easy to use if you have some basic Linux knowledge.
Source:
over 3 years ago
(Not So) Simple Plain Cubic Tutorial
It has occurred to me that providing complex tutorials in regards to ISO's has somewhat discouraging effect, thus, in today's discussion, we'll delve into a tool named Cubic.
Cubic, an anagram of "Custom Ubuntu ISO Creator", is a...
- Source: dev.to
/
over 3 years ago
Rest in peace CutefishOS, you were amazing...
In fact cutefish is based on ubuntu and the last version is based on ubuntu 21.10 it will probably be very easy to make a version of cutefish based on 22.04 you can probably even use the cubic iso tool to make it and package it.
Source:
over 4 years ago
> Is ToDesktop For Me? > If you want to make a desktop app of a website for your personal use, ToDesktop is overkill. I just want to point out that a lot of us "pros" learn how to use tools like this by semi-personal use. Therefore, you...
- Source: Hacker News
/
about 3 years ago
in safari Sonoma, do profiles act like containers ? (firefox container)
If you haven't used Fluid - https://fluidapp.com , I would recommend trying the free download.
Source:
over 3 years ago
Why is it so hard to change Chromium's UI?
You can use Min, Fluid or any browser with full screen mode to have the same effect.
Source:
over 3 years ago
CodeRabbit
Graphite
Codex 3.0 by OpenAI
Ellipsis
CodeAnt AI
Cursor
GitHub
WebCatalog New Tab
Nativeifier
ToDesktop
Rambox
Unite for macOS
Electron
Shift
