
CodeRabbit
Graphite
Codex 3.0 by OpenAI
Ellipsis
CodeAnt AI
Cursor
Typo
Cubic (Custom Ubuntu ISO Creator) is a GUI wizard to create a customized bootable Ubuntu Live CD...

Akto
Metlo API Security
Pynt.io
Discover your API surface and test authorization, OWASP API Top 10, and business-logic risks before production. Start free with no credit card.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Cubic seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 14 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | launchpad.net | apyguard.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Turkey · 1 - 9 employees |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Cubic yet.
ApyGuard is a developer-first API security testing platform that finds vulnerabilities and authorization flaws before they reach production. Most teams don't have an accurate picture of the APIs their applications actually expose. OpenAPI files go stale, and AI coding assistants (Copilot, Cursor,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Cubic Mini Cub Wood Stove Full Review | after two years
More videos
ApyGuard - API Discovery Chrome Extension
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Cubic and ApyGuard.
ApyGuard's answer:
ApyGuard starts from source code, not traffic. Most API security platforms watch production traffic to discover APIs — which means they can only see endpoints that are already deployed and receiving requests. ApyGuard discovers endpoints directly from the codebase, generates OpenAPI documentation from what it finds, and tests for OWASP API Top 10 issues — especially authorization flaws like BOLA and BFLA — before the code ships. It also comes with APIScout, a free VS Code extension (also on Open VSX for Cursor and Windsurf) that runs endpoint discovery entirely locally, so no code ever leaves the developer's machine. And unlike most of the category, pricing is public and self-serve, starting at $129/month.
ApyGuard's answer:
It depends on your situation, honestly. If you're an enterprise with a security operations team and a six-figure budget, traffic-based platforms are mature options. ApyGuard is built for the teams those platforms don't serve: startups and SMBs that ship APIs every week without a dedicated AppSec department. Compared to spec-first tools, ApyGuard doesn't require you to already have an OpenAPI file — it generates one from your code. Compared to traffic-based tools, it tests pre-production instead of after exposure. Compared to per-endpoint enterprise pricing, it starts at $129/month with a seven-day trial, no credit card and no sales call. You can find out what your API actually exposes the same day you sign up.
ApyGuard's answer:
Backend developers, DevSecOps engineers, and engineering leaders at startups and small-to-mid-sized technology companies — typically SaaS, fintech, e-commerce, and healthcare teams. A fast-growing part of our audience is teams building with AI assistants like Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code, who need to know exactly which endpoints their AI-assisted codebase actually exposes.
ApyGuard's answer:
The recurring problem: teams almost never had an accurate picture of the APIs their applications exposed. OpenAPI files went stale, undocumented endpoints shipped every sprint, and the tools that could help were priced and designed for large enterprises. AI coding assistants made the gap worse - code ships faster than anyone documents or reviews it. ApyGuard was built to close that gap from the source code side: discover what's really there, document it automatically, and test it before production - at a price a startup can actually pay.
ApyGuard's answer:
Python (static analysis and scanning engine) TypeScript (web application and VS Code extension)
Share your experience with using Cubic and ApyGuard. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


To remaster Ubuntu you can use Cubic which is easy to use if you have some basic Linux knowledge. Source: over 3 years ago
It has occurred to me that providing complex tutorials in regards to ISO's has somewhat discouraging effect, thus, in today's discussion, we'll delve into a tool named Cubic. Cubic, an anagram of "Custom Ubuntu ISO Creator", is a... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
In fact cutefish is based on ubuntu and the last version is based on ubuntu 21.10 it will probably be very easy to make a version of cutefish based on 22.04 you can probably even use the cubic iso tool to make it and package it. Source: about 4 years ago
Tracking ApyGuard since Aug 2026.
When comparing Cubic and ApyGuard, you can also consider the following products.


Akto is an Instant, Open Source API Security product. Discover all your APIs and find vulnerabilities by running 100+built-in tests. Write custom tests and automate in Akto.
Compare Akto to Cubic or ApyGuard:

Graphite is a highly scalable real-time graphing system.
Compare Graphite to Cubic or ApyGuard:

Open Source API Security Platform
Compare Metlo API Security to Cubic or ApyGuard:
Codex can now build, test & debug on autopilot
Compare Codex 3.0 by OpenAI to Cubic or ApyGuard:

Pynt offers dynamic API security testing for developers and testers to identify and fix vulnerabilities during the development lifecycle.
Compare Pynt.io to Cubic or ApyGuard: