
CSS Scan
CSS Scan Pro
Hoverify
CSS Peeper
CSSViewer
Tailwind CSS
EazyCSS
CSS Dig
Stack Overflow Trends
Glimpse
Nest.js
star-history
Hacker News Search
Google Trends Visualizer
Stack Roboflow
oDASH
CSS ScanNo Stack Overflow Trends videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Stack Overflow Trends should be more popular than CSS Scan. It has been mentiond 28 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
CSS Scan and CSS Pro are two of the best chrome extensions for front-end developers I know of. https://getcssscan.com/ https://csspro.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: about 3 years ago
> Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 3 years ago
I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: almost 4 years ago
It has, but it wasn't adopted by the pragmatists in that time. It's hard to tell if the early adopters adopted it either - It doesn't show up at all in the 2023 stack overflow survey (nor in the previous two years) - https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2023/#technology-most-popular-technologies - It doesn't show up in questions asked on Stackoverflow since 2008 -... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
> In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. I doubt that. React wasn't stable until 2015, and wasn't mainstream until 2016. > And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are faster than React out-of-the-box. Again, Next.js != React; the former builds on the latter, it doesn't replace it nor does it claim to be the same... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
> Prior to Next.js, React was hard to setup and maintain No, it wasn't. > I started using Next.js in 2017. It made React a real production framework In 2017 I had React projects in production for years. > React was hard to setup and maintain and hard to make it go fast (on first load) And it only got worse and the overengineering to make it looks fast in the first load is not worth it as modern JS frameworks are... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Based on what? https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=python%2Cjava. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Fair enough, my information is outdated. StackOverflow agrees. [1] [1] https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=django%2Cruby-on-rails. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live
Glimpse - Discover trends before they're trending
Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.
Nest.js - A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, reliable and scalable server-side applications.
CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.
star-history - The missing star history graph of github repos