
CSS Scan
CSS Scan Pro
Hoverify
CSS Peeper
CSSViewer
Tailwind CSS
CSS Dig
Shuffle for Tailwind CSS
Buildah
Podman
containerd
CRI-O
Crane
ZeroVM
BuildKit
LXD
CSS Scan
BuildahBuildah might be a bit more popular than CSS Scan. We know about 14 links to it since March 2021 and only 13 links to CSS Scan. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
CSS Scan and CSS Pro are two of the best chrome extensions for front-end developers I know of. https://getcssscan.com/ https://csspro.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Bit confused, are you not also the developer of CSS Scan? What is the difference between these, and why is the price so much higher on CSS Pro? CSS Scan doesn't even have a subscription, and the lifetime license is only $3 more than the monthly subscription on CSS Pro. Source: about 3 years ago
> Does anyone know a good extension that just does the hover / inspect element for the CSS styles in a nice way like this app? I think the same person makes CSS Scan ($95 lifetime): https://getcssscan.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
A few months ago I saw: https://getcssscan.com/ which cost US 69.99. Source: over 3 years ago
I came across css scan and it looked really nice, but then I came across css scan pro which is extremely similar to it, except for having a monthly payment instead of a one-time. Has anyone ever used these tools before, can tell me which one is better? Source: almost 4 years ago
Modern Docker releases use BuildKit, an efficient builder developed by Docker, whereas Podman uses Red Hat's Buildah. However, both solutions output OCI-compliant images, so there's no practical difference between the two for standard build workflows. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
I suspect that the GP was really asking "why not use a different tool", like buildah , buildpacks , nix ,. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Buildah specializes in building OCI-compliant container images, offering a more granular and secure approach to image creation compared to traditional Dockerfile builds. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Lockdown your Dockerized build environments --- Because privileged mode is insecure, you should restrict your CI/CD environments to known users and projects. If this isn't feasible, then instead of using Docker, you could try using a standalone image builder like Buildah to eliminate the risk. Alternatively, configuring rootless Docker-in-Docker can mitigate some --- but not all --- of the security concerns... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
In my experience, not using docker to build docker images is a good idea. E.g. buildah[0] with chroot isolation can build images in a GitLab pipeline, where docker would fail. It can still use the same Dockerfile though. If you want to get rid of your Dockerfiles anyway, nix can also build docker images[1] with all the added benefits of nix (reproducibility, efficient building and caching, automatic layering,... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
CSS Scan Pro - The easiest way to get and edit the CSS of any website, live
Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images
Hoverify - All-in-one browser extension to improve your web dev experience.
containerd - An industry-standard container runtime with an emphasis on simplicity, robustness and portability
CSS Peeper - Smart CSS viewer tailored for Designers.
CRI-O - Lightweight Container Runtime for Kubernetes