CrossBrowserTesting VS giscus

CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

giscus

A comments system powered by GitHub Discussions. Let visitors leave comments and reactions on your website via GitHub!

Landing page //
2023-10-23

Landing page //
2022-01-22

CrossBrowserTesting

Website: crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing URL: Official CrossBrowserTesting Pricing
$ Details: -

Edit details

giscus

Website: giscus.app
Pricing URL: -
$ Details

Edit details

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
Live Testing
Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
Automated Testing Integration
The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
Visual Testing
CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
Comprehensive Reports
Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
Parallel Testing
The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
Easy-to-Use Interface
The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

Cost
CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
Performance
Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
Limited Mobile Devices
While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
Learning Curve for Advanced Features
Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
Test Timeout Issues
Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

giscus features and specs

GitHub Integration
Giscus leverages GitHub Discussions for comment management, which means that it inherits all the collaborative features and ecosystem integration of GitHub.
Privacy-Focused
Since it uses GitHub for comments, Giscus does not track users or show ads, making it a more privacy-friendly alternative to other commenting systems.
Open Source
Giscus is open-source, allowing developers to inspect the code, contribute to its development, and ensure that there are no hidden functionalities.
Easy Integration
Adding Giscus to a website is straightforward and well-documented, requiring minimal effort to get up and running.
Markdown Support
Comments in Giscus support Markdown, which allows users to format their messages easily and include features like code snippets.

Possible disadvantages of giscus

GitHub Account Requirement
Users need a GitHub account to participate in discussions, which might limit engagement from non-developer audiences or those unwilling to create an account.
Dependency on GitHub
The system is heavily dependent on the availability and reliability of GitHub's services, making it vulnerable to outages or changes in GitHub's API.
Potential Complexity
The need to manage comments through GitHub Discussions might introduce complexity for users who are unfamiliar with GitHub's interface.
Limited Customization
Customization options for the appearance and behavior of the comment section are less extensive compared to some other commenting platforms.
No Anonymous Comments
The requirement for a GitHub account means that anonymous commenting is not an option, which might deter some users from participating.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

CrossBrowserTesting videos

+ Add

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

giscus videos

No giscus videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CrossBrowserTesting and giscus)

CrossBrowserTesting

giscus

Website Testing

100 100%

Website Testing

0% 0

Social Networks

0 0%

Social Networks

100% 100

Browser Testing

100 100%

Browser Testing

0% 0

Project Management

33 33%

Project Management

67% 67

User comments

Share your experience with using CrossBrowserTesting and giscus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, giscus should be more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. It has been mentiond 33 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
great list of "cool" sites from hnews
Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
How do y’all test responsiveness of website?
Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: over 5 years ago

giscus mentions (33)

Leave a Trace
Maybe giscus https://giscus.app/ It works for static sites, you just need to embed their script, and spam and moderation would be handled by GitHub. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Don't rent the cloud, own instead
Look the bottom of that page: An error occurred: API rate limit already exceeded for installation ID 73591946. Error from https://giscus.app/ Fellow says one thing and uses another. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Disqus Turned My Blog into an Ad Farm – So I Killed It
I did the same. I was sad to lose the comments, but the ads were awful and I don't particularly want someone elses ads / tracking on my hobby site. I switched to gisqus [1], which is powered by GitHub discussions, which seems to be working ok. (The site is hosted on GH pages so seems reasonable to also use GH discussions for the comments.) [1] https://giscus.app/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Rewriting my blog in plain HTML
3) No commenting feature, luckily I found your post here on HN. But it would be better to have comment blocks, like from https://giscus.app/ or just a link where readers can comment. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Ask HN: Best self-hosted wiki for local communities?
If you're a developer, you might start by using a static site generator and GitHub Pages. Stick to Markdown and start collecting and writing stuff. Sooner or later you'll get comments and regular readers. Then you might start to add editing or simply give other people access to GitHub. The editing experience of Markdown files in GitHub is not too bad and you get started in no time. From my experience it's more... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago