Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

CrashPlan VS Hyper

Compare CrashPlan VS Hyper and see what are their differences

CrashPlan

Protect Your Data. Anytime. Anywhere.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial $8 / Monthly
Alternatives Is it good?
Hyper

Extensible, cross-platform terminal built on open web standards.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Hyper seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 47 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 47
Cloud Storage popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

CrashPlan
Hyper
Website crashplan.com hyper.is
Pricing
Paid Free trial $8 / Monthly Official pricing
Open source
Company Startup from the United States · 100 - 249 employees —
Listed in
Backup And Disaster Recovery Cloud Storage Data Backup Cloud Backups Email Backup File Sharing And Backup +3
Terminal Tools Emulators Terminal Developer Tools +1

About CrashPlan and Hyper

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

CrashPlan
Hyper

CrashPlan provides cyber resilience and data protection through a unified platform trusted by organizations worldwide. With secure, scalable backup and recovery for servers, endpoints, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace, CrashPlan safeguards critical data against threats such as accidental...

Read more about CrashPlan

No description of Hyper yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

CrashPlan 8 features
Hyper 5 features
  • Unlimited Storage
    CrashPlan offers unlimited cloud storage for backups, allowing users to back up as much data as needed without worrying about hitting a cap.
  • Continuous Backup
    The software provides continuous, automatic backup, ensuring that data is protected in real-time without needing manual intervention.
  • File Versioning
    CrashPlan keeps multiple versions of files, allowing users to restore any previous version in case of accidental changes or deletions.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Available for Windows, Mac, and Linux, making it versatile and suitable for various users and environments.
  • Strong Security
    Uses AES-256 bit encryption for stored files and TLS for data transfer, ensuring a high level of security for user data.
  • Flexible Restore Options
    Offers various options for restoring files, including web-based access, making it convenient to retrieve data from anywhere.
  • Platform Integration & Ecosystem
    Backups supported for Microsoft 365 (Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams) and Google Workspace, including integration with identity providers (Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity)
  • Administration & Management
    Centralized admin dashboard for monitoring, policy enforcement, SSO integration, MDM compatibility, detailed reporting, and dashboard analytics

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    While offering valuable features, it is relatively expensive compared to some rivals, potentially putting it out of reach for budget-conscious users.
  • No Mobile App
    Lacks a dedicated mobile app, which can limit accessibility and convenience for users who need to manage backups on the go.
  • Upload Speed Limits
    Some users have reported slower upload speeds for initial backups, which can be a drawback if you need to back up large amounts of data quickly.
  • Complex Interface
    The user interface can be somewhat complex and unintuitive, which might be challenging for non-technical users.
  • Limited Customer Support
    Customer support is not available 24/7, which could be an issue for users needing immediate help outside of business hours.
  • Cross-Platform
    Hyper is available for multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for users on different platforms.
  • Extensibility
    Hyper is built on web technologies like JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, allowing users to customize and extend it with plugins and themes easily.
  • Modern UI
    It offers a sleek and modern user interface that is visually appealing and user-friendly.
  • Performance
    Despite being built on Electron, Hyper's performance is generally satisfactory for the majority of terminal tasks.
  • Ecosystem
    A rich ecosystem of plugins and themes is available, which enhances the terminal's functionality and customization options.

Possible disadvantages

  • Resource Usage
    As an Electron-based application, Hyper can consume more memory and CPU compared to more lightweight terminal emulators.
  • Startup Time
    Hyper may have a slower startup time compared to native terminal applications because it initializes a lot of components at launch.
  • Complexity
    For users who are not familiar with web development technologies, customizing and extending Hyper might be challenging.
  • Stability
    Occasional bugs and crashes can occur, especially when using numerous plugins or custom configurations.
  • Native Feature Gaps
    Some of the features available in native terminal emulators might be missing or less optimized in Hyper.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

CrashPlan
Hyper

Overall verdict

  • CrashPlan is generally considered a good choice for both individuals and businesses looking for strong, reliable backup solutions. It is particularly favorable for users who need unlimited storage and advanced security measures. However, its features might be more than what's necessary for casual users who need simpler or more cost-effective solutions.

Why this product is good

  • CrashPlan is often praised for its unlimited cloud storage for backups, comprehensive versioning, and reliable security features. Users appreciate its focus on data protection, making it a popular choice for businesses and individuals who need robust backup solutions. The service also offers continuous data protection, ensuring that files are backed up as changes are made.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses needing reliable and secure backup solutions.
  • Individuals with large amounts of data to backup who want unlimited storage.
  • Users who need comprehensive file versioning and frequent backups.
  • Anyone who prioritizes data security and continuous backup capabilities.

Overall verdict

  • Hyper is a good choice for users who value customization and a visually appealing interface over performance. While it may not match the speed and efficiency of native terminal applications, its flexibility and design appeal to those who are comfortable with and prefer Electron-based applications.

Why this product is good

  • Hyper is an electron-based terminal that is highly customizable, allowing users to enhance its functionality through plugins and themes. It's built with web technologies, making it easy for developers familiar with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS to contribute and modify. This enables a rich ecosystem of community contributions, offering users a wide variety of enhancements to tailor the terminal experience to their needs.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer a customizable terminal environment
  • Users who enjoy experimenting with plugins and themes
  • Individuals who prioritize design and aesthetics in their tooling

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

CrashPlan 1 video + Add
Hyper 3 videos + Add

Protect the Data that Matters Most with CrashPlan

Motorola One Hyper Review

More videos

  • - SKECHERS GOrun RAZOR 3 HYPER & GOrun 7 HYPER REVIEW | The Ginger Runner
  • - Motorola One Hyper "Real Review"

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
CrashPlan
Hyper
100% 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0%
0% 0%
Terminal Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Backup And Disaster Recovery
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using CrashPlan and Hyper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

CrashPlan no reviews yet
Hyper no reviews yet
  • Raising Prices is Hard
    www.backblaze.com · Sep 2019

    Early that morning news broke that our main competitor, Crashplan, was leaving the consumer backup space. You may be saying: Wait a minute, a main competitor is leaving the market and you have a mechanism to increase...

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

CrashPlan 0 mentions
Hyper 47 mentions

Tracking CrashPlan since Mar 2021.

  • A Fig That Works Anywhere — FaiTerm
    This was Fig's smartest move. Every other approach at the time either forced you onto a brand-new terminal emulator (Warp, Tabby) or left you stuck with the weak completion of the day. Fig chose to piggyback instead — it supported macOS... - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Ratty – A terminal emulator with inline 3D graphics
    Or Terminal is already a full featured web browser? https://hyper.is/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Hyper – Standards first React alternative
    I wish open-source projects checked to see if other projects share the same name. Especially since there are packages in NPM already about hyper. https://hyper.is/ has been around for a while and is kind of big. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to CrashPlan and Hyper

When comparing CrashPlan and Hyper, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...