Cram VS Intelligence Squared

• User-Friendly Interface
  Cram features a straightforward and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users of all ages to create and study flashcards.
• Large Database
  Cram boasts an extensive library of pre-made flashcards across various subjects, allowing users to easily find study materials on diverse topics.
• Mobile Accessibility
  The platform offers mobile apps for both iOS and Android, enabling users to study on the go, anytime and anywhere.
• Customizable Flashcards
  Users can create and personalize their own flashcards, including adding images and formatting text to enhance their study experience.
• Study Modes
  Cram provides different study modes, such as memorization and testing, to cater to various learning styles and improve retention.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Free Features
  Many advanced features and functionalities are locked behind a paywall, which can restrict the usefulness of the platform for free users.
• Ads for Free Users
  Free users are subjected to advertisements, which can be distracting and disrupt the flow of studying.
• No Offline Access
  Users need an internet connection to access Cram's features and flashcards, limiting its usability in areas with poor connectivity.
• Potential Quality Variability
  Since users can create their own flashcards, the quality and accuracy of content can vary widely, which might affect the reliability of study materials.
• Data Privacy Concerns
  As with any online platform, there could be concerns regarding data privacy and how user information is stored and used.

• High-quality debates
  Intelligence Squared US hosts Oxford-style debates featuring leading experts, authors, and public intellectuals on important and timely topics, providing audiences with well-structured, substantive discussions that go beyond typical media discourse.
• Balanced presentation of viewpoints
  The format requires two teams to argue for and against a motion, ensuring that audiences hear strong arguments from both sides of an issue rather than a one-sided perspective, promoting critical thinking and intellectual humility.
• Audience engagement and voting
  The live audience votes before and after each debate, and the winner is determined by which side moves the most votes. This interactive element engages viewers and provides a fascinating real-time measure of persuasion effectiveness.
• Free and accessible content
  Intelligence Squared makes its debates widely available through its website, podcasts, YouTube, and public radio, ensuring that high-quality intellectual discourse is accessible to a broad audience at no cost.
• Promotes civil discourse
  In an era of increasing polarization and hostile political rhetoric, Intelligence Squared models respectful, evidence-based argumentation and demonstrates that people with opposing views can engage each other constructively and courteously.

Possible disadvantages

• Binary framing of complex issues
  The for-or-against motion format can oversimplify nuanced topics by forcing them into a binary framework, potentially leaving out important middle-ground positions or alternative perspectives that don't fit neatly into either side.
• Limited diversity of debaters
  The debates tend to feature a recurring pool of prominent intellectuals, authors, and policy experts who often come from elite academic or media backgrounds, which can limit the range of lived experiences and perspectives represented on stage.
• Debate as performance over truth-seeking
  The competitive format incentivizes rhetorical skill and persuasion tactics over genuine truth-seeking. A more charismatic or skilled debater may win the audience over even with weaker arguments, potentially misleading viewers.
• Voting mechanism is imperfect
  The audience voting system, while engaging, can be skewed by the composition of the live audience, which may not be representative of the general public. Additionally, measuring who 'moved the most votes' doesn't necessarily reflect who made the best argument.
• Infrequent coverage of certain topics
  While the debates cover a wide range of issues, certain important but less headline-grabbing topics may be underrepresented in favor of more provocative or trending subjects that are more likely to attract large audiences and media attention.

AP World History Exam Cram Review (Pt. 1)

More videos

FAPA Intelligence Squared US Review

More videos

• 10 Best Anki Alternatives 2022
  rigorousthemes.com · Aug 2022

  Though Cram is free to use, there are some features that are only available in the premium version. You can contact them to know about the price. The complimentary premium version is available to members of National...

• These Flashcard Apps Will Help You Study Better in 2022
  collegeinfogeek.com · Jan 2022

  Cram is a fairly straightforward flashcard app with some interesting features for reviewing and studying your cards.

• These Flashcard Apps Will Help You Study Better in 2020
  collegeinfogeek.com · Jul 2020

  Cram is a fairly straightforward flashcard app with some interesting features for reviewing and studying your cards.

View more

We have no reviews of Intelligence Squared yet. Be the first one to post

• Issue in remembering what services do in questions

  This is what I did....lots of flash cards. I used cram.com, but most sites work. I strongly suggest making your own, though. Don't put everything on them, just put the things you're struggling with. It's way more efficient to just... Source: over 3 years ago

• What helped you pass Solutions Architect?

  I used Cantrill's course, TutorialDojo's practice exams, and cram.com for flash cards. I used the practice exams to help me identify where I was weak, and I'd go back and study those topics in more depth. Also, whenever I got a... Source: over 3 years ago

• How do u remember dates for history subjects

  Use flashcards. I used cram.com and made a bunch of cards to memorise stats, dates and quotes. Source: about 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Intelligence Squared since May 2026.