Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Glitch
replit
StackBlitz
CodePen
GitHub Codespaces
CloudShell
CodeSandbox
CodeTasty
Cppcheck
GlitchCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Glitch seems to be a lot more popular than Cppcheck. While we know about 116 links to Glitch, we've tracked only 10 mentions of Cppcheck. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Thank you! You may find a Live Demo example (deployed as a Bun app) mentioned in this wiki: https://github.com/fullsoak/fullsoak/wiki/Concepts-&-Example-Deployment. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
I like it! I spun up a little remixable Glitch project based on your demo so that I could play with it in a web editor. Thanks for sharing. https://glitch.com/~fullsoak. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Not suitable for complex apps or long-term projects. Learn more... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Then, we had the rise of the cloud and the arrival of cloud-based IDEs. The first cloud-based IDE was PHPanywhere (eventually becoming CodeAnywhere) in 2009, followed by Cloud9 in 2010 (before AWS bought it in 2016), Glitch (2018), GitPod (2019), GitHub Codespaces (2020), and Googleโs Project IDX (2024). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
See you on glitch.com Jenn, Director of Community and Bugs ๐ฝ. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages โ without spending a second on setup.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
StackBlitz - Online VS Code Editor for Angular and React
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.
CodePen - A front end web development playground.