Cppcheck
SonarQube
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
PVS-Studio
Parasoft C/C++test
lgtm.com
Flawfinder
Embold.io
Coverity Scan
ReSharper C++
SonarQube
Klocwork
ReSharper
PyCharm
Checkmarx
Cppcheck Embold.ioNo Embold.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Embold.io. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: 11 months ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago
Having a code review and analysis tool in CI/CD pipeline can help developers to keep their code clean. Some examples of these tools are sonarqube and embold. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
We are happy to announce our collaboration with Embold! - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Embold - https://embold.io/ Fairly new tool with Free plan for 1M executable-lines-of-code for public repositories. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
ReSharper C++ - ReSharper provides on-the-fly code analysis and eliminates errors in C#, VB.NET, XAML, ASP.NET, and XML
PVS-Studio - PVS-Studio is a useful piece of software for detecting problems in source code. The software examines program codes written in C, C++, and C# for any problems that might prohibit the code from functioning properly.
Klocwork - Klocwork is a static code analysis and SAST tool for C, C++, C#, Java, and JavaScript.