There isn't much I can say about Copysmith that is bad. The service to help content makers and marketers is plainly marketed, and that is exactly what the produce does. I'd want to see some capabilities for filtering results, for transferring information produced by one template to another, and for adding new templates. I'm quite happy with this service overall. Their software is straightforward and simple to use, and the cost is reasonable for the capabilities they offer. I also appreciate how active they attempt to be in their consumer base. They pay attention to customer feedback and are cognizant of system faults.
I have high hopes for Copysmith's next releases since I utilise a service from a firm that recognises improvements may be made while still providing excellent results.
Based on our record, Typefully should be more popular than Copysmith. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Copysmith (now with their E-commerce producrt Describely), tailored for brands and businesses, is a powerhouse of AI content creation. With over 30 diverse templates, ranging from Facebook Ad copy to Event Press Releases. Yt’s a tool that understands the varied content needs of today’s digital landscape. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
I think it's an app? It's actually copysmith.ai. I didn't post the link because for some reason it gets auto removed. Source: almost 3 years ago
Text Generation Companies using GPT-3 Https://copysmith.ai/ Https://rytr.me/ Https://www.conversion.ai/. Source: almost 3 years ago
Many tools with similar features are doing really well, including Conversion.ai and Copysmith.ai. Source: almost 3 years ago
Typefully is #3. It's the best for budget users at $8/mo. But it definitely doesn't have the good features like auto-DM, auto-plugging, and AI-assisted writing. Source: over 1 year ago
Typesafety is the extent to which a programming language prevents type errors. The process of verifying and enforcing the constraints of types may occur at compile time or at run-time. A programming language like TypeScript checks a program for errors before execution (at compile time) as a static type checker. In contrast, a library like Zod can also provide you type checking at run-time. So how does a library... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Like u/InevitablePeanuts I'm also a typefully.com user and it's THE best thread writing add-on for Twitter by far. Source: almost 2 years ago
Ps. One of my own personal twitter accounts was an anonymous one with a fun little icon, it felt strangely freeing at the tie. pps. You might be interested in typefully, if you've not yet come across it. Source: about 2 years ago
Some really great apps/tools I use for my business: - Todos: Todoist - Notes: Bear - SEO: ahrefs - Twitter: Typefully - Error tracking: Sentry - Transactional emails: Postmark - CRM: Wobaka (disclaimer: I'm the founder). Source: about 2 years ago
Copy.ai - We have created the world's most advanced artificial intelligence copywriter that enables you to create marketing copy in seconds!
Thread Creator - The best way to create and schedule Twitter threads
Anyword - An AI platform for creating effective marketing copy, trained on tens of millions of successful ads.
Hypefury - No idea what to share on Twitter?
Writesonic - If you’ve ever been stuck for words or experienced writer’s block when it comes to coming up with copy, you know how frustrating it is.
Refined Twitter - A browser extension that improves the Twitter experience