Conduit Chat Server Reviews

DebugTool Reviews

1. Ernesto Lasso

   · Design project manager at Sriservices · about 4 years ago
   Save time and deliver projects faster

   We work in an agency that develops websites mainly in WordPress, and regularly based on our experience over several years of working with multiple clients, we have discovered that one of the main problems between agency-client is communication, which often sometimes is tedious and fruitless, but now with the visual debugger is easy to point in the screen what needs to be changed and do it quickly. Also, we had a problem calculating how much our will cost our services for the customers according to the time spent on their projects but now with the "Time tracking" function, we can know exactly how much time was dedicated to the project and based on that invoice the client with greater certainty.

   I think this is a great solution for web designers that needs to clear all visual bugs of a website fast to deliver in less time and get more jobs quickly.

   🏁 Competitors: Webvizio, Atarim

   👍 Pros:    Easy to install|Very good money/value|Saves a ton of time

   👎 Cons:    New

Conduit Chat Server mentions (15)

• European Commission Trials Matrix to Replace Teams

  While I don't doubt your experience, I've been running Conduit[0] for a while now to great success (a lot simpler to configure than Synapse). I don't think it's a fact that Matrix is not good. For teams? It's pretty close to a fact. 0 - https://conduit.rs. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Self-hosting a Matrix server for 5 years

  Conduit [1] has retention policies [2] for media and attachments! [1] https://conduit.rs/ and https://gitlab.com/famedly/conduit. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Nation-scale Matrix deployments will fail using the community version of Synapse

  > I only have a handful of family users but I could still benefit from the additional vulnerability proofing of Rust Conduit[1] seems to predate Synapse Pro and I've ran it for a short while. It consumes about 32 MiB of RAM for a server with at most a dozen registered users. However, Conduit, like Dendrite, has fallen behind on implementing the latest revisions of the Matrix API. Thus I cannot fully recommend... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• The Home Server Journey - 4: Enter The Matrix

  As any open protocol, the Matrix specification has a number of different implementations, most famously Synapse (Python) and Dendrite (Go). I've been, however, particularly endeared to Conduit, a lightweight Matrix server written in Rust. Here I'll show the deployment configuration as recommended by its maintainer, Timo Kösters:. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• Shutting down the Matrix bridge to Libera Chat

  If you're talking about Element switching its contributions to Synapse from Apache to AGPL, the rationale is that folks who want to commercialise Synapse will either have to a) opensource their changes, b) pay for an AGPL exception from Element, c) use a different server (e.g. Apache-licensed Conduit from https://conduit.rs) or d) write their own server. This hardly feels like suffocating competition. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

DebugTool mentions (0)