Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Element.io VS Conduit Chat Server

Compare Element.io VS Conduit Chat Server and see what are their differences

Element.io logo Element.io

Secure messaging app with strong end-to-end encryption, advanced group chat privacy settings, secure video calls for teams, encrypted communication using Matrix open network. Riot.im is now Element.

Conduit Chat Server logo Conduit Chat Server

Conduit is a simple, fast and reliable chat server powered by Matrix.
  • Element.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-20
  • Conduit Chat Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-14

Element.io features and specs

  • Open Source
    Element.io is open-source, meaning the code is freely accessible and can be modified by anyone. This allows for transparency, security audits, and customization.
  • Privacy and Security
    Element.io offers end-to-end encryption for secure communication, ensuring that only the intended recipients can read the messages.
  • Interoperability
    It supports the Matrix protocol, which allows for communication across different platforms and services, facilitating greater connectivity.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Element.io provides features such as voice and video calls, file sharing, and integrations with other services, making it suitable for both personal and team use.
  • Cross-Platform
    Available on various platforms including web, desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux), and mobile (iOS, Android), ensuring accessibility from any device.
  • Customizability
    Users can personalize their experience through various settings and even set up their own server for full control over their data.

Possible disadvantages of Element.io

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and customization options can be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Issues
    Users have reported occasional performance issues such as slow response times and lag, particularly in larger rooms or with heavy media use.
  • User Interface
    While functional, the user interface may not be as polished or intuitive as other more mainstream messaging apps, which could impact usability.
  • Server Setup
    Setting up your own server for complete data control requires technical expertise and can be time-consuming, posing a barrier for non-technical users.
  • Limited Network Effect
    Despite its capabilities, Element.io has a smaller user base compared to giants like WhatsApp or Slack, which may limit its usefulness for some users.
  • Resource Intensive
    The application can be resource-intensive, particularly on older hardware, which may result in slower performance or increased battery consumption on mobile devices.

Conduit Chat Server features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Conduit is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for smaller servers or applications with limited resources.
  • Easy Installation
    The installation process for Conduit is straightforward, allowing users to quickly set up their own chat server without extensive technical knowledge.
  • Federation Support
    Conduit supports Matrix protocol federation, allowing it to connect and communicate with other Matrix servers, enabling decentralized communication.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Conduit allows users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering community-driven development and transparency.
  • Performance
    Conduit is optimized for fast performance and low memory usage compared to other Matrix servers, providing an efficient experience even under high load.

Possible disadvantages of Conduit Chat Server

  • Feature Completeness
    Conduit may lack some advanced features provided by more established Matrix servers such as Synapse, making it less suitable for complex use cases.
  • Community Support
    Being relatively newer and less widespread than other servers, Conduit might have a smaller user base, leading to potentially less community support and fewer resources.
  • Scalability
    While suitable for smaller deployments, Conduit might face challenges when scaling to very large user bases compared to more robust and mature solutions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    Conduit may not yet have the same level of integration with third-party applications and services as more widely adopted chat server alternatives.
  • Stability
    As a newer project, Conduit might have more stability issues compared to well-established Matrix servers that have undergone extensive testing.

Analysis of Element.io

Overall verdict

  • Element.io is a good choice for those looking for a secure and privacy-focused communication platform with rich features and high customizability. Its open-source nature and ability to integrate with other services enhance its appeal to a wide range of users.

Why this product is good

  • Element.io, previously known as Riot.im, is considered a good platform due to its focus on security and privacy, offering end-to-end encryption for conversations. It is built on the Matrix protocol, which supports decentralized communication, making it a versatile and open-source choice for both individual and group communication. It is designed for interoperability and can integrate with other messaging and collaboration platforms. Additionally, it offers extensive customization options and support for both text and voice/video communications.

Recommended for

    Element.io is highly recommended for privacy-conscious users, open-source enthusiasts, tech-savvy individuals, organizations seeking secure internal communication channels, and communities needing decentralized and customizable messaging solutions.

Element.io videos

RIOT : Riot.im : A New World Of Open Communication!

Conduit Chat Server videos

No Conduit Chat Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Element.io and Conduit Chat Server)
Communication
97 97%
3% 3
Group Chat & Notifications
Messaging
97 97%
3% 3
Chat
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Element.io and Conduit Chat Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Element.io and Conduit Chat Server

Element.io Reviews

7 best Mattermost alternatives for secure business messaging
Element is a secure messaging and communication software that operates based on the Matrix protocol. It has advanced features that promote internal collaboration and boost team productivity. It offers end-to-end encryption and supports communication through messages, voice, and video calls.
Source: www.rocket.chat
10 Best Secure Messaging Apps to Keep Your Conversation Private
Element.io, which was earlier known as Riot, is a secure chat app that is built around protecting user privacy. It offers end-to-end encryption out of the box, which means that your conversations are fully encrypted and only the sender and receiver can read the messages. After the transition from Rio to Element, the secure messaging app has become more enterprise-friendly.
Source: beebom.com
18 Best Discord Alternatives 2020 | Expert Reviews
Element, formerly known as Riot, is a great alternative to Discord with many of the same features and functions. What sets Element apart is that it was created using open-source software, which allows for customization and flexibility. Element is based on a reaction-based software called Matrix, which allows you to bring other communication channels into the app as well as...
5 best secure private messengers
Neither Riot nor Matrix have been fully audited, although Olm and Megolm have been. Riot.im has been criticized the past for its rather basic user interface, but this no longer true. It still lags behind the futuristic flashiness of Wire, but Riot is now a highly capable messenger with functionality often compared to the corporate messaging workhorse, Slack.
Source: proprivacy.com
11 Alternatives to Whatsapp that Actually Respect Your Privacy
Formerly Riot.im, Element uses Matrix as a back end, and is an excellent chat app for those who like open source from end to end. Everything from the chat client, the chat protocol, and the video conferencing software are all open source, which is an important part of why Element is so respectful of your privacy. In the open source community, people are generally very...

Conduit Chat Server Reviews

We have no reviews of Conduit Chat Server yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Conduit Chat Server seems to be a lot more popular than Element.io. While we know about 13 links to Conduit Chat Server, we've tracked only 1 mention of Element.io. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Element.io mentions (1)

Conduit Chat Server mentions (13)

  • Nation-scale Matrix deployments will fail using the community version of Synapse
    > I only have a handful of family users but I could still benefit from the additional vulnerability proofing of Rust Conduit[1] seems to predate Synapse Pro and I've ran it for a short while. It consumes about 32 MiB of RAM for a server with at most a dozen registered users. However, Conduit, like Dendrite, has fallen behind on implementing the latest revisions of the Matrix API. Thus I cannot fully recommend... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • The Home Server Journey - 4: Enter The Matrix
    As any open protocol, the Matrix specification has a number of different implementations, most famously Synapse (Python) and Dendrite (Go). I've been, however, particularly endeared to Conduit, a lightweight Matrix server written in Rust. Here I'll show the deployment configuration as recommended by its maintainer, Timo Kösters:. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Shutting down the Matrix bridge to Libera Chat
    If you're talking about Element switching its contributions to Synapse from Apache to AGPL, the rationale is that folks who want to commercialise Synapse will either have to a) opensource their changes, b) pay for an AGPL exception from Element, c) use a different server (e.g. Apache-licensed Conduit from https://conduit.rs) or d) write their own server. This hardly feels like suffocating competition. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • The Future of Synapse and Dendrite
    Reminder - https://conduit.rs/ Rust implementation of the matrix server stack. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • IRC Is the Only Viable Chat Protocol
    Many who have causally read about Matrix and looked into running a homeserver have run across the reference implementation Synapse, which is (IMO only, pls no flame) a bloated python monstrosity. This turned me off for years. A second-gen (?) alternative written in Go called Dendrite is much lighter weight, but is lacking in some features last I looked. A couple of years ago, I found Conduit (https://conduit.rs/)... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Element.io and Conduit Chat Server, you can also consider the following products

Matrix.org - Matrix is an open standard for decentralized persistent communication over IP.

Cinny - A Matrix client where you can enjoy the conversation using simple, elegant and secure interface protected by e2ee with the power of open source.

Telegram - Telegram is a messaging app with a focus on speed and security. It’s superfast, simple and free.

Signal - Fast, simple & secure messaging. Privacy that fits in your pocket.

SchildiChat - SchildiChat is a Matrix client based on Element with a more traditional instant messaging experience.

Tox - Send messages, files, create groups and make Tox to Tox audio and video calls. Securely.