Software Alternatives & Startups

Commit Together by Github VS Proxyman.io

Compare Commit Together by Github VS Proxyman.io and see what are their differences

Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Commit Together by Github Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Proxyman.io

Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Proxyman.io Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source $49 / Annually

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Proxyman.io seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 27 links to Proxyman.io, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github.

social mentions
1 vs 27
Developer Tools popularity
11% vs 89%
alternatives listed
87 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Commit Together by Github
Proxyman.io
Website github.blog proxyman.com
Pricing
Open source $49 / Annually Official pricing
Platforms
Mac OSX
Listed in

About Commit Together by Github and Proxyman.io

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Commit Together by Github
Proxyman.io

No description of Commit Together by Github yet.

Modern and Delightful HTTP Debugging Proxy Proxyman is a native, high-performance macOS application, which enables developers to observe and manipulate HTTP/HTTPS requests.

Read more about Proxyman.io

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Commit Together by Github 4 features
Proxyman.io 7 features
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Proxyman.io provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple platforms including macOS, Windows, and Linux, ensuring a broad range of users can utilize the tool.
  • Real-time Traffic Interception
    Proxyman.io offers real-time traffic interception and inspection, enabling users to debug and analyze traffic as it happens.
  • HTTPS Decryption
    The tool supports HTTPS decryption, allowing users to view encrypted traffic for more thorough analysis.
  • Customizable Filters
    Users can set up customizable filters to focus on specific types of traffic or protocols, enhancing productivity and efficiency.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Proxyman.io provides detailed documentation and tutorials, helping users to make the most of the software.
  • Active Community and Support
    The tool has an active community and responsive support team, providing assistance and updates regularly.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    While Proxyman.io offers a free trial, the full version is paid, which might be a barrier for some users or smaller organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, new users might still experience a learning curve to fully utilize all features.
  • Resource Intensive
    The application can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down the system when intercepting high volumes of traffic.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version has limitations in terms of features and volume of traffic it can handle, which may necessitate purchasing the paid version for extensive use.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Like any software, it can have occasional bugs or performance issues, although these are generally addressed quickly by the development team.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Commit Together by Github
Proxyman.io

No analysis of Commit Together by Github yet.

Overall verdict

  • Proxyman.io is generally considered a good tool for developers in need of a robust and intuitive proxy tool. It provides essential features for network traffic analysis with a clean and modern interface.

Why this product is good

  • Proxyman.io is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and powerful features that make it an effective tool for web debugging. It supports a range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, and offers functionalities such as breakpoints, request/response modification, and SSL proxying. Its integration with MacOS makes it a preferred choice for developers in that ecosystem.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • Mobile developers
  • Security researchers
  • Quality assurance engineers

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Commit Together by Github
Proxyman.io
11% 11%
89% 89%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and Proxyman.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Commit Together by Github no reviews yet
Proxyman.io no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Commit Together by Github 1 mention
Proxyman.io 27 mentions
  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • Charles Proxy
    I don't have elaborate needs and have used Charles for many years. A few years ago I switched to https://proxyman.com and found it easier to use. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Essential Mobile Testing Tools: A Developer's Complete Guide
    Network analysis tools like Charles Proxy and Proxyman provide essential debugging capabilities for mobile applications. These tools intercept and analyze all network traffic, enabling detailed inspection of API communications. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Catching useful errors when parsing JSON fails in Swift
    Armed with this you could now investigate the raw JSON using HTTP proxying (I like to use ProxyMan for this), and/or talk to the back-end team, see if they've made some changes and are aware of the breakage in the contract between client... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Commit Together by Github and Proxyman.io

When comparing Commit Together by Github and Proxyman.io, you can also consider the following products.