Software Alternatives & Startups

Commit Together by Github VS Hololink

Compare Commit Together by Github VS Hololink and see what are their differences

Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Rating
0 reviews
Hololink

Democratising Augmented Reality with the most intuitive editor on the market, combined with the highest performing image tracking. All web-based and app-free!

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $59 / Monthly (Pro including 3 white labels, 1 GB storage & unlimited views)
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Hololink should be more popular than Commit Together by Github. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 2
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
87 vs 169

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Commit Together by Github
Hololink
Website github.blog hololink.io
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $59 / Monthly (Pro including 3 white labels, 1 GB storage & unlimited views) Official pricing
Platforms
iOS Android Mac OSX Windows Linux Firefox Safari Chrome OS Google Chrome Chromium +7
Company 2021
Listed in

About Commit Together by Github and Hololink

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Commit Together by Github
Hololink

No description of Commit Together by Github yet.

Hololink is a web-based Augmented Reality editor which enables creation of AR through a visual no-code solution. AR created in Hololink is served directly in the mobile browser without the use of an app, making the whole process from creation to end-user 100% browser-based. Hololink gives...

Read more about Hololink

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Commit Together by Github 4 features
Hololink 2 features
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.
  • Augmented Reality Editor
  • Augmented Reality Viewer

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Commit Together by Github 0 videos + Add
Hololink 4 videos + Add

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Hololink - Augmented reality creation, made easy

More videos

  • - Hololink - democratising augmented reality
  • - Easily Create Augmented Reality Experiences with Hololink
  • - Hololink business card demo

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Commit Together by Github
Hololink
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and Hololink. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Commit Together by Github 1 mention
Hololink 2 mentions
  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • IMAGE TRACKING! What is it?
    And, just to toot our own horn, Hololink has some of the absolutely best image tracking on the market? We don't just think so ourselves, but we've had people contact us to tell us that it's better than both Zappar and 8th Wall. But don't... Source: over 3 years ago
  • When developing webAR experiences, which AR features would be most useful to you?
    I work as the project manager at hololink.io, ranked amongst the top webAR wysiwyg editors, and when we develop we try to always create features directly for our users instead of second guessing and delivering stuff that people may not... Source: over 3 years ago

Alternatives to Commit Together by Github and Hololink

When comparing Commit Together by Github and Hololink, you can also consider the following products.