Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Commit Together by Github VS GitLocalize

Compare Commit Together by Github VS GitLocalize and see what are their differences

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

GitLocalize logo GitLocalize

Localize your GitHub repository, continuously.
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • GitLocalize Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-14

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

GitLocalize features and specs

  • Integration with GitHub
    GitLocalize seamlessly integrates with GitHub, allowing for easy setup and synchronization of repositories, which streamlines the translation workflow.
  • Live Preview
    The platform offers a live preview feature that enables translators to see changes in real-time, helping them understand the context better and ensuring translations are accurate.
  • Automated Workflow
    GitLocalize automates much of the translation process, such as synchronizing source and translated content, which reduces manual work and errors.
  • Support for Multiple File Formats
    The tool supports various file formats, accommodating different project needs and making it versatile for different types of documents.
  • Collaboration Features
    It enables multiple translators to work simultaneously on a project, improving collaboration and speeding up the translation process.

Possible disadvantages of GitLocalize

  • Limited Free Plan
    The free version of GitLocalize offers limited features, which might not be sufficient for larger projects or teams requiring advanced functionalities.
  • Learning Curve
    New users may experience a learning curve when getting acquainted with the platform, particularly if they are not familiar with Git-based workflows.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    Since GitLocalize is deeply integrated with GitHub, it can be limiting for users who prefer or need to use a different version control system.
  • Translation Memory
    GitLocalize’s translation memory features may not be as advanced or comprehensive as some dedicated, stand-alone translation tools.
  • Performance Issues
    For very large projects, some users might experience performance issues, such as slow load times or delays in processing translations.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Commit Together by Github and GitLocalize)
Productivity
74 74%
26% 26
Localization
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
68 68%
32% 32
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Commit Together by Github and GitLocalize. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

GitLocalize might be a bit more popular than Commit Together by Github. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Commit Together by Github. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

GitLocalize mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Commit Together by Github and GitLocalize, you can also consider the following products

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Transifex - Transifex makes it easy to collect, translate and deliver digital content, web and mobile apps in multiple languages. Localization for agile teams.

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

Crowdin - Localize your product in a seamless way

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Datree.io - GitOps policy engine