I had a lot of with Code Crafters. It's a paid platform, but they give you a basic walk through of different technologies, with full test suites. For example, you implement some basic Redis. It doesn't spoon feed you what to do, but breaks it down into manageable chunks. https://codecrafters.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

To make this happen, I'm starting with the Shell Challenge at CodeCrafters.io. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

Have you ever thought of building your own shell — or anything you use in your daily tasks? It could be an IDE, a simple database, or even a text editor. In this blog, I’ll walk you through the exciting journey of building a shell using the Codecrafters platform. I’ll share why the experience is amazing and why you should absolutely give it a try! - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

This is where today's quick tip comes into play. Do you know Codecrafters.io? If you don't, let's remedy that now! It's a platform that monthly proposes building projects of different complexity, guiding you step by step in studying and developing. Some of the latest projects include reproducing your own version of Git, Redis, BitTorrent, or your Interpreter. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

I recently started learning Rust using the awesome CodeCrafters website. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

There's nim [1] which is aiming for the same thing - syntax similar to python and performance similar to C++, zig etc. 1 - https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 25 days ago

> GC languages are slower This is not necessarily true. It depends on a language, e.g. Go is slow, Nim[0] is extremely fast with conventional GC and slightly faster with ARC/ORC[1]. GC programs can be faster than manually managed ones in some cases. It's just manual memory management gives you more control of where and when free is called. And a good type system is a privelege that gives Nim more control with... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

First glance I thought someone was referring to https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

That's actually a great argument for Nim[0]. Easy interop with C, native-speed performance, and a syntax very close to Python in both readability and how quickly you can get something working. Batteries included, automatic memory management without a conventional GC and metaprogramming - is a really cool combination. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Coincidentally, just a few days ago, I tried to run Nim[0] on Windows XP as an experiment. And to my surprise, the latest 32-bit release of Nim simply works out the box. But Nim compiles to C, so I also needed C compiler and all modern versions of mingw failed to launch. After some time I managed to find very old Mingw (gcc 4.7.1) that have finally worked [0]. [0] - https://nim-lang.org/ [1] -... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago