Code for Fun VS ST - Simple Terminal

• Engaging Curriculum
  Code for Fun offers an engaging curriculum designed to spark interest in coding among students, making learning enjoyable and effective.
• Experienced Instructors
  The program boasts experienced instructors who are skilled at teaching coding in an accessible and understandable way for children and teens.
• Wide Range of Courses
  Code for Fun provides a broad selection of courses catering to different ages and skill levels, from beginner to advanced programming topics.
• Flexible Learning
  With options for online and in-person classes, Code for Fun offers flexible learning modalities to accommodate different learning preferences and schedules.
• Focus on Creativity
  The program emphasizes creativity in coding, encouraging students to explore and develop their own projects, thereby enhancing their problem-solving skills.

Possible disadvantages

• Costs
  The courses can be quite pricey, which may not be affordable for all families wishing to enroll their children in coding classes.
• Limited Locations for In-Person Classes
  In-person classes may be limited to certain geographical locations, restricting accessibility for interested participants outside those areas.
• Technology Requirements
  Participants need to have access to a computer and stable internet for online classes, which might be a barrier for some students.
• Learning Pace
  The standardized pace of the courses may not suit all learners, as some students might require more time to grasp certain concepts.

• Lightweight
  ST is designed to be extremely lightweight, making it fast and responsive even on older machines.
• Minimal Dependencies
  ST aims to minimize dependencies, which simplifies installation and reduces potential for conflicts with other software.
• Customizability
  ST's source code is intended to be modified by users to fit their needs, allowing deep personalization and optimization.
• Simplicity
  ST follows the Suckless philosophy of simplicity, providing essential features without unnecessary bloat.
• Open Source
  ST is open source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the development of the software.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  Due to its minimalist design, ST lacks some advanced features found in other terminals, which might be essential for certain users.
• Manual Configuration
  ST requires users to modify its source code for configuration, which can be a barrier for those unfamiliar with programming.
• Lack of Pre-built Binaries
  ST typically needs to be compiled from source, which can be inconvenient compared to using package managers with pre-built binaries.
• Basic Look and Feel
  The focus on minimalism means ST does not provide out-of-the-box eye candy or extensive customization of appearance through simple configuration files.
• Community Size
  ST has a smaller community compared to more popular terminals, potentially making it harder to find support or plugins for additional functionality.

We have no reviews of Code for Fun yet. Be the first one to post

• The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
  www.fosslinux.com · Apr 2021

  The st or Simple Terminal emulator gives you precisely what you ask for. ” A simple terminal emulator to interact with your Linux distro.”

• Top 14 Terminal Emulators for Linux (With Extra Features or Amazing Looks)
  itsfoss.com · Apr 2021

  Simple Terminal or popularly known as st is an alternative for users who dislike bloated terminal emulators like xterm or rxvt.

Tracking Code for Fun since Jul 2021.

• Linux Terminal Memory Usage

  I've been using st-terminal[1] for 5-6 years at this point. It starts instantly, uses ~10mb of Ram and has almost zero latency. It's especially apparent on X11 without compositing enabled. I tried ghostty the last year and I was... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Linux Terminal Memory Usage

  i've been using xst https://github.com/gnotclub/xst, a fork of suckless st https://st.suckless.org/ for a long period, but there's also st-flexipatch https://github.com/bakkeby/st-flexipatch available which now includes sixel support. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Tabby – A Terminal for the Modern Age

  Last I personally used Alacritty was 3-4 years back on Linux w/ wayland got some weird rendering bugs, switched to st (https://st.suckless.org/) for a good while. When I got a Macbook last year, I did a "best terminal macos" search and... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

View more