Table of contents
ST - Simple Terminal
st is a simple terminal implementation for X.
As ST - Simple Terminal is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Lightweight
ST is designed to be extremely lightweight, making it fast and responsive even on older machines.
Minimal Dependencies
ST aims to minimize dependencies, which simplifies installation and reduces potential for conflicts with other software.
Customizability
ST's source code is intended to be modified by users to fit their needs, allowing deep personalization and optimization.
Simplicity
ST follows the Suckless philosophy of simplicity, providing essential features without unnecessary bloat.
Open Source
ST is open source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the development of the software.
Promote ST - Simple Terminal. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if ST - Simple Terminal is good.
Check the traffic stats of ST - Simple Terminal on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of ST - Simple Terminal on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of ST - Simple Terminal's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of ST - Simple Terminal on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about ST - Simple Terminal on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Last I personally used Alacritty was 3-4 years back on Linux w/ wayland got some weird rendering bugs, switched to st (https://st.suckless.org/) for a good while. When I got a Macbook last year, I did a "best terminal macos" search and evaluated multiple terminals; kitty, ghostty, iterm2 and wezterm. Settled on ghostty because it just felt faster for terminal refreshes when I use vite. Nothing too extreme. Iterm2... - Source: Hacker News / 15 days ago
Whenever I switch to another dev's machine, usually running either jetbrains or vscode, I'm always astounded at how annoyed I find myself while typing on it due to the high latency on keystrokes. I'm blessed with ~subframe delay using [st](https://st.suckless.org/) and neovim, and now I don't know if I could ever go back to a "true" IDE for professional work. Just for kicks I've started work on my own text editor... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
The terminal I am currently using is st but I have also tested this "Vifm" enhancement in kitty and alacritty. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Perhaps st: https://st.suckless.org. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> you need to "edit your makefile". That isn't going to work for distributions Is it not? [st] requires exactly that. And distros seem to have no issues shipping it. [st] https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Check out st[1] for a minimal terminal implementation. They also have user-submitted patches that you can apply to add desired functionality. [1] https://st.suckless.org. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I am fundamentally and ideologically opposed to using a terminal emulator implemented in electron. If you feel similarly, then you might enjoy https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
My journey of using terminal emulators began together with my introduction to Linux about 7 years ago. GNOME terminal was my first as it came pre-installed on Ubuntu, my first Linux distribution. Since then, I've had the opportunity to explore and utilize a range of terminal emulators, including Alacritty, Kitty, st, Konsole, xterm, and most recently iTerm2. It's been interesting to experiment with these different... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
For those looking for a minimal VT100 terminal emulator without the legacy baggage of Xterm, I highly recommend checking out Suckless Software’s st: https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
That last reference builds off of the work of the other two. It also breaks down how NOT modern Xterm is, but, if I've read it correctly, it confirms that its input latency is low compared to all other tested terminal emulators, including Alacritty and ST, which humorously and justifiably thrashes Xterm on its homepage for being a bloated program. Its not a good choice for everyone: it has poor right-to-left text... Source: over 2 years ago
ST is a favorite of some fervent minimalists. I do not think you would like it. Source: over 2 years ago
Https://st.suckless.org/ used to have a circa st-0.8 fork that supported full color sixel graphics, but it seems that specific patch is not in the official list anymore. [1] You can even compose that with the scrollback patch to scroll back in your gnuplots. I use this all the time. In fact, I just have GNUTERM="sixelgd enhanced linewidth 3 fontscale 2 size 1600,900 truecolor" in my environment variables. [1]... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I'm using st. The thing is that in the terminal and also in other applications pasting with "Ctrl+v" does work. Just not in neomutt. Source: almost 3 years ago
I was curious if anyone here had some software they could recommend? I am having a hard time finding an alternative for tmux, slock, dmenu, and st though I am researching. I am also researching archiving and compression libraries in 100% Common Lisp to replace tar and such. I am also reading over the source code for cl-git as I know I will not find a Lisp implementation that does not rely on C for git protocol :(. Source: almost 3 years ago
I use st (suckless simple terminal), so my opinion, which I share with suckless, is that it's the other way around: a good terminal does not reimplement what tmux etc. Already do. So, I use st + tmux, which is a fantastic combination that gives me everything I need. Source: almost 3 years ago
I run suckless terminal. I have its 16-colour palette configured to my liking, and it is 256-colour (and 24-bit colour I think?) capable. Source: about 3 years ago
St. [1] Its simple and has everything I need, which is utf-8 support. Tabs and stuff I do via tmux. [1] https://st.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Building a terminal emulator from scratch is not that hard. Check out st, although it's written in C and targets X11, the overall principles are universal and you probably won't find a cleaner and more concise code base to study on this planet. Source: about 3 years ago
Also https://lists.suckless.org/dev/1307/16688.html And its in the literal front page of st. Https://st.suckless.org/ Under Status. Source: over 3 years ago
Why not include suckless st here? It has a somewhat functional un-official sixel patch. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://st.suckless.org - minimal terminal emulator uses low ram usage like dwm. Source: over 3 years ago
The Simple Terminal, commonly referred to as "st," developed by Suckless Software, has carved out a peculiar niche for itself within the spectrum of Linux terminal emulators. With its explicit focus on minimalism, performance, and customization, it appeals to a specific subset of users in the Linux community, primarily those who value simplicity and efficiency over a plethora of features.
A recurring theme in reviews and discussions about st is its adherence to minimalist principles. As highlighted in various posts, users who prefer straightforward, non-bloated software often turn to st due to its lightweight nature. This is evident in comments that emphasize its subframe keystroke latency, which provides a snappy and responsive interface. Such performance makes it particularly attractive to developers who demand real-time feedback during coding sessions, ensuring an uninterrupted workflow.
The terminal's minimalist design is often lauded for its elegance; however, this simplicity is a double-edged sword as it forgoes features that are commonly included in more modern terminal emulators. Consequently, while it caters to those who prioritize speed and responsiveness, it may not satisfy users looking for built-in functionalities like integrated tabs, profiles, or extensive configuration options out-of-the-box.
st stands out for its customization capabilities, but with a twist: instead of complex configuration files, customization is achieved by editing the source code and applying patches provided by the community. This approach ensures bloat-free software tailored to the user's specific needs at the cost of a steeper learning curve. Posts discuss various user-submitted patches available on the st website that enable additional features like scrollback and sixel graphics support. This level of customization attracts proficient Linux users who are comfortable with C programming and manual modifications.
Public opinion on st is divided. Enthusiasts celebrate its straightforward nature, heralding it as a solution for those dissatisfied with the "bloated" nature of alternatives like xterm or rxvt. However, some critics see its minimalism as too restrictive, pointing out limitations in right-to-left text display and inadequate Unicode support for non-Latin alphabets.
Nonetheless, st's lightweight footprint and reliable performance continue to make it a preferred choice for developers focused on efficiency and low resource utilization. It is often coupled with tools like tmux to compensate for its lack of more advanced terminal management features.
In summary, Simple Terminal from Suckless is a tool for the purist—a no-frills solution that excels in providing a fast, efficient terminal experience at the cost of extensive built-in features. It appeals to those who appreciate customization, optimization, and performance, albeit requiring a level of technical adeptness to unlock its full potential. As a result, st remains a staple for a specific demographic within the Linux community, symbolizing the quintessential traits of simplicity and functionality.
Do you know an article comparing ST - Simple Terminal to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is ST - Simple Terminal good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss ST - Simple Terminal here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
