Checkvist VS PostSharp

• Search and Filtering
  With smart syntax
• Email-in-tasks
  Ability to create tasks from email
• Recurring due dates
• Markdown
• Tags
  Custom tagging
• Priorities
  Priority setting and color-coding
• Web clipper
  For Chrome and Firefox
• Keyboard support
  Vim-like keyboard support
• Clean UI
• Customizable
  Customize UI with CSS

• Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP)
  PostSharp allows developers to implement AOP in .NET projects, which helps in separating cross-cutting concerns like logging, error handling, or validation, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
• Code Reusability
  By using aspects, developers can write code that can be easily reused across different parts of an application, reducing redundancy and improving efficiency.
• Maintainability
  PostSharp helps to create a more modular codebase. With cross-cutting concerns handled separately, it becomes easier to manage and modify without affecting the core business logic.
• Performance
  PostSharp weaves aspects into compiled code at build time, which generally leads to better runtime performance compared to other AOP approaches that might involve reflection or dynamic proxies.
• Rich Library of Aspects
  It provides a comprehensive library of pre-built aspects like caching, threading, and security, which can accelerate development by reducing the need to implement common functionalities from scratch.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  For developers unfamiliar with AOP, there might be a steep learning curve to understand and effectively leverage PostSharp's capabilities.
• Debugging Complexity
  The abstraction layer introduced by aspects can make debugging more challenging as it might not be immediately clear where certain behaviors or errors originate from.
• Cost
  PostSharp is a commercial product with licensing fees, which might be a concern for small projects or organizations with limited budgets.
• Build Time Overhead
  The process of weaving aspects into the code can increase the time taken for builds, which might be noticeable and frustrating for very large projects.
• Vendor Lock-in
  Relying heavily on PostSharp-specific features might lead to challenges if there's a need to switch to a different AOP framework or if PostSharp's development ceases.

Ultra Productivity with Autofocus v.4 and Checkvist

More videos

Aspect Oriented Programming with PostSharp | Pluralsight

More videos

• Seamless, smooth, beautiful experience
  SaaSHub review

  · May 2020

  I cannot recommend Checkvist highly enough: project manager, meeting agenda, brainstorming a programme, you name it Checkvist is very likely exactly what you need. The keyboard control is quite simply unsurpassed!

We have no reviews of PostSharp yet. Be the first one to post

• *exits Unity after staring at scene for 5 seconds*

  I like using checkvist.com to break down a project. It's a to-do list, but you can zoom into subtasks which can be 'focused' into and appear as its own master list... You can break things down infinitely in a clean way. Source: over 3 years ago

• Frequent loss of keyboard focus - expected?

  Thanks, yes I can see it's tricky. An outcome of Logseq's ambition I suppose. My primary tool for this kind of thing is Checkvist which is simpler but ergonomically very elegant and predictable. I'm looking at Logseq for more ramified... Source: over 3 years ago

• Outliner + UpNote

  You might check out Checkvist. Simply link from an UpNote note to there for certain lists and you're done. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking PostSharp since Mar 2021.