Chatbase Reviews

1. christophepais

   about 3 years ago
   Bad work

   Chatbase Evaluation: Definitely, after many hours of uploading documents that I have been refining, it continues to respond with absurd or incorrect answers, and sometimes even claims to have no information when it had answered correctly just 10 minutes before. A significant waste of time and money.

Open Science Framework Reviews

Chatbase mentions (12)

• Show HN: Put ChatGPT on any website in 5 seconds. No signup required

  Congrats on the launch. How is it different from - https://chatbase.co/ https://sitegpt.ai/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• ChatGPT trending down hard in a lot of places (although not in India)

  More and more people won’t use the base product directly, but downstream products such as https://chatbase.co, Microsoft Copilot integrated in all office applications, upcoming robots such as OpenAI Neo, etc. Source: about 3 years ago

• Paid AI to train on company docs?

  Chatbase.co is a good one. You can upload any text related file or pdf. Pretty user friendly and there's a lifetime deal on appsumo right now. Source: about 3 years ago

• Upload multiple pdfs and ask questions about these pdfs

  I know there are several services out there such as chatbase.co (https://www.chatbase.co/) What service do you use? Source: about 3 years ago

• What GPT/AI apps do you actually use? I'll share my favorites

  Chatbase.co is a web app where you can embed pdf-s and then ask anything about it. It's an awesome tool to create questions for my college lecture notes and find answers in lengthy documents to easy questions (e.g.: How many times can I take an exam for free?). There is a free version which is enough most of the time for these kinds of use cases. Source: about 3 years ago

Open Science Framework mentions (38)

• So you wanna de-bog yourself

  Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and publishes his research and related artifacts there, which I really appreciate! [1] https://www.econtalk.org/a-users-guide-to-our-emotional-thermostat-with-adam-mastroianni/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Ask HN: How to discover new and interesting papers?

  Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're based on your Google Scholar record and alerts, so I guess you'll need both/one of those for it to work. https://scholar.google.com Second, Scopus from Elsevier (a company that plenty... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• Bad numbers in the “gzip beats BERT” paper?

  It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those the author performed. There was so much talk of needing this post-"replication crisis.". - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• For members of "science twitter" who are opposed to Twitter's recently deployed content-wall - what are some alternative platforms that help academics openly share and discuss scientific research?

  2.Open Science Framework - A non-profit (but not open source) "GitHub for scientific research" [4]. OSF is an incredible team and and product, that helps scientists openly publish their papers, datasets, code, and other research outputs. Their website is also geared towards a technical audience too - they help scientists store information, but they don't have a feature that helps users discover discuss new... Source: about 3 years ago

• Análisis sobre el impacto de bajar los impuestos marginales - USS

  Our headline result is that a 10 percent increase in taxes is associated with a decrease in annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of approximately −0.2 percent when bundled as part of a TaxNegative tax-spending-deficit combination. The same tax increase is associated with an increase in annual GDP growth of approximately 0.2 percent when part of a TaxPositive fiscal policy package. All of our data, output,... Source: about 3 years ago