arXiv VS Open Science Framework

I’m also curious about the role decentralized, open knowledge bases might play as a counterweight to AI-driven narrowing. Could initiatives like Wikidata, arXiv, or IPFS provide a bulwark against knowledge collapse by making marginal information more accessible? There’s lots of room for further work here. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago

Just read some AI papers on https://arxiv.org , that will give you an idea(but don't worry too much, they probably used some AI in the making of those papers, lol). But as soon the next generation of AI is out (the next step in AI), everything will change again. Source: 5 months ago

Prepublisher journals, or https://arxiv.org. Source: 5 months ago

Check out paperswithcode, scroll through arxiv, or browse some well-known conferences in the field (NeurIPS, ICML). Source: 5 months ago

I recently noticed that symplectic geometry has its own category on https://arxiv.org/, and generally after some quick research it looks like it's a very active field in math. Source: 6 months ago

Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and publishes his research and related artifacts there, which I really appreciate! [1] https://www.econtalk.org/a-users-guide-to-our-emotional-thermostat-with-adam-mastroianni/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're based on your Google Scholar record and alerts, so I guess you'll need both/one of those for it to work. https://scholar.google.com Second, Scopus from Elsevier (a company that plenty... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those the author performed. There was so much talk of needing this post-"replication crisis.". - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

2.Open Science Framework - A non-profit (but not open source) "GitHub for scientific research" [4]. OSF is an incredible team and and product, that helps scientists openly publish their papers, datasets, code, and other research outputs. Their website is also geared towards a technical audience too - they help scientists store information, but they don't have a feature that helps users discover discuss new... Source: 10 months ago

Our headline result is that a 10 percent increase in taxes is associated with a decrease in annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of approximately −0.2 percent when bundled as part of a TaxNegative tax-spending-deficit combination. The same tax increase is associated with an increase in annual GDP growth of approximately 0.2 percent when part of a TaxPositive fiscal policy package. All of our data, output,... Source: 10 months ago