Software Alternatives & Reviews

figshare VS Open Science Framework

Compare figshare VS Open Science Framework and see what are their differences

figshare logo figshare

Securely store and manage your research outputs in the cloud, or make them openly available and citable.

Open Science Framework logo Open Science Framework

Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.
  • figshare Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • Open Science Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-18

figshare videos

Figshare for Institutions Admin User Guide Video: Reviewing Items

More videos:

  • Review - Figshare for Institutions — The All in One Repository
  • Demo - Figshare repository demonstration

Open Science Framework videos

What is the Open Science Framework all about?

More videos:

  • Review - Pre-Registering your Research with Open Science Framework

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to figshare and Open Science Framework)
Research Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Education
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using figshare and Open Science Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Open Science Framework seems to be a lot more popular than figshare. While we know about 38 links to Open Science Framework, we've tracked only 2 mentions of figshare. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

figshare mentions (2)

  • My super useful websites collection for you all!
    -Crystal growing information Http://xrayweb.chem.ou.edu/notes/xtalgrow.html Https://www.chemistryviews.org/details/education/2538901/Tips\_and\_Tricks\_for\_the\_Lab\_Growing\_Crystals\_Part\_2.html Free science Figures Https://smart.servier.com/ Https://phil.cdc.gov/ Databases of molecules and data Https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/ - database of bioactive molecules with drug-like... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Want to post my research
    I am a PhD student and conducting a clinical trial in eczema. I have used figshare.com to make my work public, which is used by many universities and academics to disseminate their work for free! No doubt that publishing in journals is the best way to reach your target audience, however there might be cost implications. Source: over 2 years ago

Open Science Framework mentions (38)

  • So you wanna de-bog yourself
    Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and publishes his research and related artifacts there, which I really appreciate! [1] https://www.econtalk.org/a-users-guide-to-our-emotional-thermostat-with-adam-mastroianni/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • Ask HN: How to discover new and interesting papers?
    Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're based on your Google Scholar record and alerts, so I guess you'll need both/one of those for it to work. https://scholar.google.com Second, Scopus from Elsevier (a company that plenty... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Bad numbers in the “gzip beats BERT” paper?
    It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those the author performed. There was so much talk of needing this post-"replication crisis.". - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • For members of "science twitter" who are opposed to Twitter's recently deployed content-wall - what are some alternative platforms that help academics openly share and discuss scientific research?
    2.Open Science Framework - A non-profit (but not open source) "GitHub for scientific research" [4]. OSF is an incredible team and and product, that helps scientists openly publish their papers, datasets, code, and other research outputs. Their website is also geared towards a technical audience too - they help scientists store information, but they don't have a feature that helps users discover discuss new... Source: 10 months ago
  • Análisis sobre el impacto de bajar los impuestos marginales - USS
    Our headline result is that a 10 percent increase in taxes is associated with a decrease in annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of approximately −0.2 percent when bundled as part of a TaxNegative tax-spending-deficit combination. The same tax increase is associated with an increase in annual GDP growth of approximately 0.2 percent when part of a TaxPositive fiscal policy package. All of our data, output,... Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing figshare and Open Science Framework, you can also consider the following products

Mendeley - Easily organize your papers, read & annotate your PDFs, collaborate in private or open groups, and securely access your research from everywhere.

MIT License - A license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Sorc'd - Content curation tool- Capture anywhere, use it everywhere!

GPLv2 - Created for the GNU project, the GNU General Public License version 2 is the most popular free software license.

Academia.edu - Academia is a website where you can share papers that are written with other users. You can use a Google or Facebook account to sign in to the website.

AGPL - GNU Affero General Public License. Strong license for applications designed to guarentee user freedoms to access, modify, and redistribute server-side code.