
Fiddler
Proxyman.io
HTTP Toolkit
mitmproxy
Surge for Mac
nginx
Weer
HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

DISQUS
giscus
Cusdis
ReplyBox
talkatv
HashOver
Remark42
A lightweight comments widget built on GitHub issues.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, utterances seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 53 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | charlesproxy.com | utteranc.es |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Charles Proxy videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
SEMANTICS-7: Utterances, Sentences & Propositions
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Charles Proxy and utterances. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Charles Proxy is another tool that has a good popularity. It is a web proxy i.e., HTTP proxy or HTTP monitor that runs on your computer. Compared to Paw which works on only macOS, Charles proxy if configured or run...
As the name says, Charles proxy is an HTTP and reverse proxy. It works by routing local traffic through it.
Although thousands of developers around the globe use Wireshark and Charles Proxy, they fail to occupy the top side in the design aspect. Wireshark’s interface is robust and detailed but can be intimidating for...
We have no reviews of utterances yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Charles Proxy since Mar 2021.
Utterances: **The primary inspiration for giscus. It uses **GitHub Issues instead of Discussions to store comments. It is extremely lightweight but does not support threaded replies as natively as giscus. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Title: [TIL][Jekyll] Removing Disqus and switching to utteranc to use github issue as article comments Published: false Date: 2021-05-14 00:00:00 UTC Tags: Canonical_url:... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
'use client'; Import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react'; Const Comments = ({ issueTerm }) => { const commentsSection = useRef(null); useEffect(() => { const script = document.createElement('script'); script.src =... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
When comparing Charles Proxy and utterances, you can also consider the following products.

Fiddler is a debugging program for websites.
Compare Fiddler to Charles Proxy or utterances:

Disqus is a global comment system that improves discussion on websites and connects conversations across the web.
Compare DISQUS to Charles Proxy or utterances:

Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.
Compare Proxyman.io to Charles Proxy or utterances:

A comments system powered by GitHub Discussions. Let visitors leave comments and reactions on your website via GitHub!
Compare giscus to Charles Proxy or utterances:

Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.
Compare HTTP Toolkit to Charles Proxy or utterances:

Open-source, lightweight comment system for your website
Compare Cusdis to Charles Proxy or utterances: