Software Alternatives & Reviews

Capybara VS BrowserStack

Compare Capybara VS BrowserStack and see what are their differences

Capybara logo Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.

BrowserStack logo BrowserStack

BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.
  • Capybara Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-05
  • BrowserStack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-05

BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform powering over two million tests every day across 15 global data centers. With BrowserStack, developers can comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real mobile devices and browsers in a single cloud platform—and at scale. BrowserStack helps Tesco, Shell, NVIDIA, Discovery, Wells Fargo, and over 50,000 customers deliver quality software at speed.

Capybara

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

BrowserStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Starts at single user plans and billed annually)
Platforms
Mac OSX Android Windows Browser Web iOS Google Chrome Firefox Safari REST API Internet Explorer
Release Date
2012 September

Capybara features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

BrowserStack features and specs

  • Cloud-based: Yes
  • Browser Extensions: Yes
  • SaaS: Yes

Capybara videos

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Schrade Old Timer 30OT Capybara Fixed Blade Knife Review
  • Review - Capybara Video Review

BrowserStack videos

BrowserStack Overview

More videos:

  • Tutorial - SpeedLab by BrowserStack
  • Review - SharePoint Team Finds BrowserStack Invaluable

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Capybara and BrowserStack)
Automated Testing
16 16%
84% 84
Website Testing
4 4%
96% 96
Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
7 7%
93% 93

User comments

Share your experience with using Capybara and BrowserStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Capybara and BrowserStack

Capybara Reviews

We have no reviews of Capybara yet.
Be the first one to post

BrowserStack Reviews

Why choose HeadSpin over BrowserStack?
Companies like HeadSpin and BrowserStack play a significant role in fulfilling the demand for testing on real devices and cross-browser devices. Their ability to test on real devices online and monitor digital experiences adds to the value proposition of organizations implementing testing solutions. However, every company has different requirements and here are a few reasons...
Source: www.headspin.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Capybara should be more popular than BrowserStack. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Capybara mentions (11)

  • 16 Best Ruby Frameworks For Web Development [2024]
    Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Using Capybara to test responsive code
    Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Minitest vs. RSpec in Rails
    Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • From partials to ViewComponents: writing reusable front-end code in Rails
    The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Tip: if you're changing all your form_for to form_with, take the opportunity to make sure all forms are being tested.
    To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

BrowserStack mentions (6)

  • Unsupported country
    If you go to browserstack.com (a website to test other websites) you can probably to the chatgpt url and sign up there. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Windows vs Mac?
    For testing on Mac or iOS, use browserstack.com, you'll spend considerably less using that than you would buying the actual hardware. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Free methods for testing websites/apps across devices?
    I've seen subscription services such as browserstack.com and lambdatest.com but I believe they cost to get the full range of mac browsers and devices. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Is it possible to remotely control a cell phone using node?
    In all reality your best bet is probably something like browserstack. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Front-End web development on Linux challenges when displaying on Windows / Mac
    There's no convenient solution. You may find using browserstack.com is a little easier than maintaining Windows and macOS systems locally. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Capybara and BrowserStack, you can also consider the following products

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.