Table of contents
Robustness
Capybara provides a robust framework for testing web applications. It offers a natural way to simulate how a user would interact with your app, making it highly efficient for end-to-end testing.
DSL
Capybara's Domain Specific Language (DSL) is expressive and easy to understand, making test scripts straightforward to write and maintain, even for those who may not be deeply familiar with Ruby.
Integration
Capybara easily integrates with Ruby on Rails applications and is designed to work seamlessly with testing frameworks like RSpec and Cucumber, providing flexibility in testing suite setup.
Multiple Drivers Support
Capybara supports multiple drivers, allowing tests to be run in different browsers, which aids in cross-browser testing.
Asynchronous Operations
Capybara has built-in support for dealing with asynchronous web applications, which makes it suitable for testing modern web applications with dynamic content updates.
Promote Capybara. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Capybara is good.
Check the traffic stats of Capybara on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Capybara on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Capybara's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Capybara on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Capybara on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
For example, there is a Ruby on Rails application that uses Webpacker and has JavaScript files that are covered by the system tests. Capybara is used as the system testing tool. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: over 3 years ago
I like to use capybara https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
For instance, the acceptance test above requires a log in routine. Here's where the expressive power of a DSL like Capybara manifests:. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
In our project, we’ve been running system tests (then called rather "Feature tests") since around 2016. System tests use a real browser in the background and test all layers of a Rails application at once: from the database all the way up to the nuances of JavaScript loaded together with the web pages. Back then, we wrote our system tests using Capybara with Poltergeist, a driver that ran a headless Phantom JS... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Before I began programming in Rails, (where it's the name of a testing framework), I'd (apparently) never heard of a capybara. Then the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon kicked in, and hard. Source: about 4 years ago
Rails already included an acceptance testing framework (called SystemTestCase). It uses Capybara and most users already noticed Capybara tends to produce flaky testcases. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Capybara to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Capybara good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Capybara here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
Loved the Idea of human-like acceptance testing and great to see it's written in ruby.