RSpec VS Capybara

When starting a Rails project, you have a lot of decisions to make. Whether or not to write tests should not be one of them. The big decision is to use Minitest or Rspec. Both of those testing frameworks are great and provide everything you need to test a Rails application thoroughly. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago

As a beginner you can skip it, just focus on understanding Rails' philosophy and getting comfortable with it. However, make sure you remember to come back to unit testing later bc it's a mandatory skill for a Rails developer. Unit test can help you understand your project's specs thoroughly (assume its test coverage is more than 90%). I recommend learning RSpec instead of Rails' built-in testing tool (the one... Source: 10 months ago

RSpec is a testing framework for Ruby that is widely used in the Ruby on Rails community. It allows developers to write and execute automated tests. RSpec promotes behavior-driven development (BDD) by providing a readable syntax for describing the expected behavior of the application. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

In the Ruby programming language, one of the most popular testing frameworks is RSpec. RSpec is a flexible and expressive testing tool that allows you to write and run automated tests for your Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

There’s one very readable way to do it in Ruby using RSpec. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago