
Canny.io
Upvoty
UserVoice
Featurebase
productboard
Nolt.io
Frill
BareMetrics
WebComponents.dev
Deco IDE
React Native Desktop
Eve
Pinegrow + Atom
StackBlitz
Pinegrow WP
Vue.js
Canny.io
WebComponents.devProduct managers, software development teams, startups, and companies that want to engage their user base in the feedback process and prioritize feature development based on real customer input.
No WebComponents.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Canny.io should be more popular than WebComponents.dev. It has been mentiond 43 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
So I have been looking at what already implements it. Canny and Featurebase both do dedup, but their pricing scales with tracked users or admin seats. Fider is open source but is a feedback board only, with no roadmap or changelog attached. FeedLog is the closest to what I described here: MIT licensed, self-hostable, and it runs the similarity search at input time rather than as a batch job, which is the part I... - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
What's the difference between this and like https://canny.io/ ? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
This is a slightly different feature set, but being more customer feedback centric rather than OKR centric might be worth considering: https://canny.io/. Source: over 2 years ago
Solutions like canny.io makes >$2M in ARR. My aim is to create product combining some features from canny and wiredash. Source: over 2 years ago
Researched the market and found https://wiredash.io/ - which is great tool, but it costs so much. 99 usd monhtly is.... 5 hours of work in Poland, where I live. Also I want to share project roadmap with my users inside it. Something like https://canny.io/ integrated into app. Source: over 2 years ago
How the tag name gets into your code can vary based on the method you are using to write your components. If you load up a few of the templates over on WebComponents.dev you'll see that many examples just use a string value typed into the define function directly. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
WebComponents.dev — In-browser IDE to code web components in isolation with 58 templates available, supporting stories and tests. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
We will show the benefits of Atomico through a comparison, we have used as a basis for this comparison the existing counter webcomponents in webcomponents.dev of Atomico, Lit, Preact and React as a base. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Unfortunately, I couldn't get this to work in the online LWC editor https://webcomponents.dev So assuming this also won't work in the shadow DOM enviroment of SF? Source: over 4 years ago
WebComponentsDev have a lot of libraries and info (like codesandbox, but webcomponents land): Https://webcomponents.dev/. Source: over 4 years ago
Upvoty - User feedback in 1 simple overview 🔥
Deco IDE - Best IDE for building React Native apps
UserVoice - UserVoice integrates easy-to-use feedback, helpdesk, and knowledge base management tools in one platform that empowers users to speak and companies to understand.
React Native Desktop - Build OS X desktop apps using React Native
Featurebase - The all-in-one toolkit for managing your customer feedback.
Eve - Programming designed for humans