Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Canny.io VS react-testing-library

Compare Canny.io VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Canny.io logo Canny.io

Canny helps you collect and organize feature requests to better understand customer needs and prioritize your roadmap.

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • Canny.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

Canny.io features and specs

  • User Feedback Management
    Canny offers a centralized platform for collecting, organizing, and prioritizing customer feedback. This streamlines the process of understanding user needs and determining what features to build next.
  • Roadmap Transparency
    Canny allows companies to share their product roadmaps with their users, increasing transparency and trust. Users can see what features are planned, in progress, or completed.
  • Engagement
    By allowing users to vote on features and suggestions, Canny increases user engagement and makes them feel involved in the product development process.
  • Integrations
    Canny integrates with various popular tools like Intercom, Slack, and GitHub, enabling seamless workflows and better team collaboration.
  • Analytics
    Canny provides analytics and reporting tools to help teams understand trends in user feedback and make data-driven decisions.
  • Seamless Integration
    The integration between Canny and Intercom is seamless, allowing for easy setup and interaction. It enables teams to use both tools without having to constantly switch contexts.
  • Improved Product Development
    By gathering insights directly from users, product teams can make informed decisions, leading to improved product features and functionality that closely align with user needs.
  • Customer Engagement
    Engaging with customers becomes more streamlined, as Canny provides a platform within Intercom for users to submit their ideas and see progress, thereby increasing transparency and trust.
  • Centralized Feedback System
    Canny consolidates feedback from various channels into a single location, making it easier to track, analyze, and act upon without switching between different platforms.
  • User Engagement
    Canny Changelog allows companies to keep their users engaged by providing continuous updates on product features and improvements, making users feel involved in the development process.
  • Streamlined Communication
    This tool centralizes communication about product updates, ensuring that users and stakeholders receive consistent and clear information through one platform.
  • Feedback Loop
    Integrating changelogs with feedback features allows developers to capture user reactions to new updates, thereby creating a beneficial feedback loop for future development.
  • Customization
    Canny Changelog offers customization options, enabling businesses to tailor the appearance and content to fit their branding and specific audience needs.
  • Easy Integration
    The product changelog can be easily integrated into existing workflows and platforms, making it a seamless addition to a company's software ecosystem.

Possible disadvantages of Canny.io

  • Cost
    Canny is a paid service and the cost can be a barrier for small startups or companies with limited budgets.
  • Ramp-up Time
    New users and teams might require some time to fully understand and utilize all the features that Canny offers, which could involve a learning curve.
  • Limited Customization
    Some users may find the platform's customization options somewhat limited, which could be a constraint for companies with very specific needs or workflows.
  • Dependency on User Participation
    The effectiveness of Canny heavily relies on user participation. If users are not actively providing feedback or voting, the tool's utility can diminish.
  • Feature Scope
    Canny's focus is on feedback management and roadmapping, but it doesn’t cover other aspects of product management like task tracking or sprint planning, which might necessitate additional tools.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might encounter a learning curve when familiarizing themselves with Canny and its integration with Intercom, which may take some time to get used to efficiently.
  • Potential Overlap
    For companies already using other feedback management systems, Canny could create overlap, leading to confusion and potential data redundancy.
  • Cost Considerations
    Depending on the pricing structure of both Canny and Intercom, the integration may lead to higher costs, which could be a consideration for smaller businesses or startups.
  • Dependency on Intercom
    Companies that are looking to switch away from Intercom might find themselves tied to the platform due to the deep integration with Canny, potentially limiting flexibility in choosing communication tools.
  • Cost Implications
    Depending on the pricing structure, the use of Canny Changelog might lead to additional costs for a company, which could be a factor for smaller businesses or startups.
  • Overhead for Management
    Managing and regularly updating the changelog can introduce extra overhead for product teams, who must ensure timely and accurate entries.
  • Dependency on External Tool
    Relying on an external tool for changelogs may pose a risk if there are service disruptions or if the tool's features change in ways that don't align with business needs.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis of Canny.io

Overall verdict

  • Canny.io is a solid choice for teams looking to streamline their product feedback process and ensure they are focusing on the features that matter most to their users. It is well-regarded for its ease of use, integration capabilities, and ability to provide actionable insights from customer feedback.

Why this product is good

  • Canny.io is generally considered a good tool because it facilitates customer feedback, helps prioritize product features, and enhances communication between product teams and users. It offers features like voting on suggestions, a changelog to communicate updates, and a roadmap to provide transparency, making it especially useful for software development and product management teams.

Recommended for

    Product managers, software development teams, startups, and companies that want to engage their user base in the feedback process and prioritize feature development based on real customer input.

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Canny.io videos

How to Collect Customer Feedback Using Canny.io

More videos:

react-testing-library videos

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Canny.io and react-testing-library)
Customer Feedback
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
User Feedback
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Canny.io and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Canny.io and react-testing-library

Canny.io Reviews

10 Best Canny Alternatives and Competitors in 2025
UserVoice is a Canny.io alternative that dives deeper into customer feedback. While Canny offers feedback based on upvoting, UserVoice goes further by collecting feedback from multiple avenues including email, questionnaires, chat, and automated feedback forms. Use this tool to leverage user feedback and build more innovative products. ⚒️
Source: clickup.com
Top 10 FeatureBase alternatives you should evaluate in 2024
Canny stands out as a popular solution for enterprise-level clients seeking robust product roadmap and feature request capabilities. Beyond its core functionalities, Canny (opens in new tab) has an enhanced user interface and seamless user experience, suitable mainly for large-scale businesses. Canny is a b2b customer feedback tool that lets you track which customers want...
Source: featureos.app
17 Best Canny Alternatives in 2024
If you're a founder, product manager, or part of a product team evaluating tools to manage customer feedback and feature requests, you've likely come across Canny. But before settling on Canny, it's worth exploring some of the top Canny alternatives available in 2024.
Source: supahub.com
18 Best Idea Management Software to Facilitate Innovation 2023
Canny is an AI tool that helps teams capture, organize, and analyze product feedback so they can better understand what their customers want to see. Canny allows you to add relevant company data from other work tools, categorize feedback based on use cases, and filter the requests you see rolling in so no customer request goes untouched.
Source: clickup.com
30+ Customer Feedback Tools comparison
The coverage rate metric measures the percentage of users that have provided you with feedback. UserVoice reports that at least 15% coverage rate is considered satisfactory with typical rate ranging up to 50%. While Canny customers see a typical rate of 5%.
Source: clearflask.com

react-testing-library Reviews

We have no reviews of react-testing-library yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library should be more popular than Canny.io. It has been mentiond 137 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Canny.io mentions (43)

  • Deduplicating feature requests with pgvector: the threshold is a trap
    So I have been looking at what already implements it. Canny and Featurebase both do dedup, but their pricing scales with tracked users or admin seats. Fider is open source but is a feedback board only, with no roadmap or changelog attached. FeedLog is the closest to what I described here: MIT licensed, self-hostable, and it runs the similarity search at input time rather than as a batch job, which is the part I... - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • Show HN: I Built a Customer Feedback Tool
    What's the difference between this and like https://canny.io/ ? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Affordable product management tool to track OKR and product roadmaps
    This is a slightly different feature set, but being more customer feedback centric rather than OKR centric might be worth considering: https://canny.io/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Feedback SaaS platform dedicated to Flutter - rate my idea
    Solutions like canny.io makes >$2M in ARR. My aim is to create product combining some features from canny and wiredash. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Feedback SaaS platform dedicated to Flutter - rate my idea
    Researched the market and found https://wiredash.io/ - which is great tool, but it costs so much. 99 usd monhtly is.... 5 hours of work in Poland, where I live. Also I want to share project roadmap with my users inside it. Something like https://canny.io/ integrated into app. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

react-testing-library mentions (137)

  • Test-Driven Development for Building User Interfaces
    React Testing Library’s core philosophy is that we should write our tests in such a way that we simulate user behavior. By testing what the user can actually do, our tests focus less on implementation details and more on the actual user interface, which leads to less brittle tests and a more reliable test suite. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Chaos-Driven Testing for Full Stack Apps: Integration Tests That Break (and Heal)
    In the main branch, we set up Vitest as the test runner and React Testing Library for rendering the component and simulating user interactions. We also set up MSW to intercept the network requests and return mock responses. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • 🚀 9 Libraries to Boost Your Productivity as a React Developer
    React Testing Library (RTL) provides lightweight utilities built on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, designed to promote testing through user interactions rather than component internals. Instead of working with component instances, RTL encourages querying and asserting against actual DOM nodes, just like real users would. This approach improves test reliability and pushes developers toward writing more... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Best Practices for React Applications
    Testing ensures code reliability and maintainability. Jest, Vitest and React Testing Library are standard tools for unit and integration testing. Unit tests verify individual components, while integration tests ensure features work together. For example, testing a TodoList component might involve:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Canny.io and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

Upvoty - User feedback in 1 simple overview 🔥

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

UserVoice - UserVoice integrates easy-to-use feedback, helpdesk, and knowledge base management tools in one platform that empowers users to speak and companies to understand.

Vitest - A blazing fast unit test framework powered by Vite

Featurebase - The all-in-one toolkit for managing your customer feedback.

Enzyme - Enzyme is a JavaScript testing utility for React.