Caldis MOS VS cppq

• Customizable
  Caldis MOS offers flexibility in configuration, allowing users to customize mouse behaviors to suit their specific needs.
• Cross-Platform
  Caldis MOS supports multiple operating systems, making it a versatile solution for users with different setups.
• Open Source
  Being open source, Caldis MOS allows developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code, fostering a community-driven development.
• Enhanced Productivity
  By enabling complex mouse gestures and macros, Caldis MOS can significantly boost user productivity.
• Frequent Updates
  The software receives regular updates, ensuring that it remains secure and packed with the latest features.

Possible disadvantages

• Learning Curve
  New users might find the customization options and settings overwhelming, requiring a period of adjustment and learning.
• Potential Instability
  As an advanced tool that interacts deeply with the mouse hardware and software, there might be occasional stability issues or bugs.
• Resource Intensive
  Caldis MOS can be resource-intensive, potentially impacting system performance, especially on older or less powerful machines.
• Limited Support
  Being a community-driven project, users might find support options limited compared to commercial software.
• Compatibility Issues
  There may be compatibility issues with certain devices or software, necessitating troubleshooting and potential workaround solutions.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

• Zed Editor Theme-Builder

  You could use Mos, which also has the advantage that smooth scrolling works the same in every app (speed, acceleration etc) https://mos.caldis.me/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Building the Mouse Logitech Won't Make

  I frequently came across this, but it doesn't work for iPadOS so I never tried it, maybe it would work for you: https://mos.caldis.me/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Silicon Valley Tea Party a.k.a. the great 1998 Linux revolt take II

  Only with hardware acceleration turned off. Which in my experience causes a stuttery and laggy experience which can hardly be described as "smooth". If you really want to use MacOS's smooth scrolling, use MOS (https://mos.caldis.me) and... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.